Sorting algorithms/Sleep sort
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.
Sorting Algorithm
This is a sorting algorithm. It may be applied to a set of data in order to sort it.
For comparing various sorts, see compare sorts.
For other sorting algorithms, see sorting algorithms, or:
Heap sort | Merge sort | Patience sort | Quick sort
O(n log2n) sorts
Shell Sort
O(n2) sorts
Bubble sort |
Cocktail sort |
Cocktail sort with shifting bounds |
Comb sort |
Cycle sort |
Gnome sort |
Insertion sort |
Selection sort |
Strand sort
other sorts
Bead sort |
Bogo sort |
Common sorted list |
Composite structures sort |
Custom comparator sort |
Counting sort |
Disjoint sublist sort |
External sort |
Jort sort |
Lexicographical sort |
Natural sorting |
Order by pair comparisons |
Order disjoint list items |
Order two numerical lists |
Object identifier (OID) sort |
Pancake sort |
Quickselect |
Permutation sort |
Radix sort |
Ranking methods |
Remove duplicate elements |
Sleep sort |
Stooge sort |
[Sort letters of a string] |
Three variable sort |
Topological sort |
Tree sort
In general, sleep sort works by starting a separate task for each item to be sorted, where each task sleeps for an interval corresponding to the item's sort key, then emits the item. Items are then collected sequentially in time.
Task: Write a program that implements sleep sort. Have it accept non-negative integers on the command line and print the integers in sorted order. If this is not idomatic in your language or environment, input and output may be done differently. Enhancements for optimization, generalization, practicality, robustness, and so on are not required.
Sleep sort was presented anonymously on 4chan and has been discussed on Hacker News.
Ada
<lang Ada>with Ada.Text_IO; with Ada.Command_Line; use Ada.Command_Line; procedure SleepSort is
task type PrintTask (num : Integer); task body PrintTask is begin delay Duration (num) / 100.0; Ada.Text_IO.Put(num'Img); end PrintTask; type TaskAcc is access PrintTask; TaskList : array (1 .. Argument_Count) of TaskAcc;
begin
for i in TaskList'Range loop TaskList(i) := new PrintTask(Integer'Value(Argument(i))); end loop;
end SleepSort;</lang>
- Output:
./sleepsort 35 21 11 1 2 27 32 7 42 20 50 42 25 41 43 14 46 20 30 8 1 2 7 8 11 14 20 20 21 25 27 30 32 35 41 42 42 43 46 50
APL
<lang APL> sleepsort←{{r}⎕TSYNC{r,←⊃⍵,⎕DL ⍵}&¨⍵,r←⍬} </lang>
Bash
<lang bash> function sleep_and_echo {
sleep "$1" echo "$1"
}
for val in "$@"; do
sleep_and_echo "$val" &
done
wait </lang>
- Output:
$ ./sleep_sort.sh 35 21 11 1 2 27 32 7 42 20 50 42 25 41 43 14 46 20 30 8 1 2 7 8 11 14 20 20 21 25 27 30 32 35 41 42 42 43 46 50
BBC BASIC
This does not explicitly 'sleep', but uses timers to implement the different delays. <lang bbcbasic> INSTALL @lib$+"TIMERLIB"
DIM test%(9) test%() = 4, 65, 2, 31, 0, 99, 2, 83, 782, 1 FOR i% = 0 TO DIM(test%(),1) p% = EVAL("!^PROCtask" + STR$(i%)) tid% = FN_ontimer(100 + test%(i%), p%, 0) NEXT REPEAT WAIT 0 UNTIL FALSE DEF PROCtask0 : PRINT test%(0) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask1 : PRINT test%(1) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask2 : PRINT test%(2) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask3 : PRINT test%(3) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask4 : PRINT test%(4) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask5 : PRINT test%(5) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask6 : PRINT test%(6) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask7 : PRINT test%(7) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask8 : PRINT test%(8) : ENDPROC DEF PROCtask9 : PRINT test%(9) : ENDPROC</lang>
Output:
0 1 2 2 4 31 65 83 99 782
Brainf***
<lang C> >>>>>,----------[++++++++ ++[->+>+<<]>+>[-<<+>>]+++ +++++[-<------>]>>+>,----
<<+[->>>>>+<<<<<]>>
]>>>[<<<<[<<<[->>+<<[->+> [-]<<]]>[-<+>]>[-<<<.>>>> ->>>>>[>>>>>]<-<<<<[<<<<< ]+<]<<<<]>>>>>[>>>>>]<] </lang> Not exactly 'sleep' sort but it is similar: it inputs an array of digits and in each iteration reduces elements by 1. When an element becomes 0 – it prints the original digit.
Input: 1539\n
Output: 1359
C
<lang C>#include <stdlib.h>
- include <unistd.h>
- include <sys/types.h>
- include <sys/wait.h>
int main(int c, char **v) {
while (--c > 1 && !fork()); sleep(c = atoi(v[c])); printf("%d\n", c); wait(0); return 0;
}</lang>
Running it:<lang>% ./a.out 5 1 3 2 11 6 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
11</lang>
If you worry about time efficiency of this sorting algorithm (ha!), you can make it a 100 times faster by replacing the sleep(...
with usleep(10000 * (c = atoi(v[c])))
. The smaller the coefficient, the faster it is, but make sure it's not comparable to your kernel clock ticks or the wake up sequence will be wrong.
C#
<lang csharp>using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Threading;
class Program {
static void ThreadStart(object item) { Thread.Sleep(1000 * (int)item); Console.WriteLine(item); }
static void SleepSort(IEnumerable<int> items) { foreach (var item in items) { new Thread(ThreadStart).Start(item); } }
static void Main(string[] arguments) { SleepSort(arguments.Select(int.Parse)); }
}</lang>
Using Tasks
<lang csharp>var input = new[] { 1, 9, 2, 1, 3 };
foreach (var n in input) Task.Run(() => { Thread.Sleep(n * 1000); Console.WriteLine(n); }); </lang>
Output, i.e. in LINQPad:
1 1 2 3 9
C++
<lang cpp>
- include <chrono>
- include <iostream>
- include <thread>
- include <vector>
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i) { threads.emplace_back([i, &argv]() { int arg = std::stoi(argv[i]); std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(arg)); std::cout << argv[i] << std::endl; }); }
for (auto& thread : threads) { thread.join(); }
} </lang>
- Output:
./a.out 8 15 14 9 17 20 16 24 6 24 21 23 19 23 19 6 8 9 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 23 23 24 24
Clojure
Using core.async <lang clojure>(ns sleepsort.core
(require [clojure.core.async :as async :refer [chan go <! <!! >! timeout]]))
(defn sleep-sort [l]
(let [c (chan (count l))] (doseq [i l] (go (<! (timeout (* 1000 i))) (>! c i))) (<!! (async/into [] (async/take (count l) c)))))</lang>
<lang clojure>(sleep-sort [4 5 3 1 2 7 6])
- => [1 2 3 4 5 6 7]</lang>
CoffeeScript
<lang coffeescript> after = (s, f) -> setTimeout f, s*1000
- Setting Computer Science back at least a century, maybe more,
- this algorithm sorts integers using a highly parallelized algorithm.
sleep_sort = (arr) ->
for n in arr do (n) -> after n, -> console.log n
do ->
input = (parseInt(arg) for arg in process.argv[2...]) sleep_sort input
</lang> output <lang> > time coffee sleep_sort.coffee 5, 1, 3, 4, 2 1 2 3 4 5
real 0m5.184s user 0m0.147s sys 0m0.024s </lang>
Common Lisp
<lang lisp>(defun sleeprint(n)
(sleep (/ n 10)) (format t "~a~%" n))
(loop for arg in (cdr sb-ext:*posix-argv*) doing
(sb-thread:make-thread (lambda() (sleeprint (parse-integer arg)))))
(loop while (not (null (cdr (sb-thread:list-all-threads)))))</lang>
- Output:
$ sbcl --script ss.cl 3 1 4 1 5 1 1 3 4 5
D
<lang d>void main(string[] args) {
import core.thread, std; args.drop(1).map!(a => a.to!uint).parallel.each!((a) { Thread.sleep(dur!"msecs"(a)); write(a, " "); });
}</lang>
- Output:
$ ./sorting_algorithms_sleep_sort 200 20 50 10 80 10 20 50 80 200
Dart
<lang dart> void main() async {
Future<void> sleepsort(Iterable<int> input) => Future.wait(input .map((i) => Future.delayed(Duration(milliseconds: i), () => print(i))));
await sleepsort([3, 10, 2, 120, 122, 121, 54]);
} </lang>
- Output:
2 3 10 54 120 121 122
Delphi
<lang Delphi>program SleepSortDemo;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
Windows, SysUtils, Classes;
type
TSleepThread = class(TThread) private FValue: Integer; FLock: PRTLCriticalSection; protected constructor Create(AValue: Integer; ALock: PRTLCriticalSection); procedure Execute; override; end;
constructor TSleepThread.Create(AValue: Integer; ALock: PRTLCriticalSection); begin
FValue:= AValue; FLock:= ALock; inherited Create(False);
end;
procedure TSleepThread.Execute; begin
Sleep(1000 * FValue); EnterCriticalSection(FLock^); Write(FValue:3); LeaveCriticalSection(FLock^);
end;
var
A: array[0..15] of Integer; Handles: array[0..15] of THandle; Threads: array[0..15] of TThread; Lock: TRTLCriticalSection; I: Integer;
begin
for I:= Low(A) to High(A) do A[I]:= Random(15); for I:= Low(A) to High(A) do Write(A[I]:3); Writeln;
InitializeCriticalSection(Lock); for I:= Low(A) to High(A) do begin Threads[I]:= TSleepThread.Create(A[I], @Lock); Handles[I]:= Threads[I].Handle; end; WaitForMultipleObjects(Length(A), @Handles, True, INFINITE); for I:= Low(A) to High(A) do Threads[I].Free; DeleteCriticalSection(Lock);
Writeln; ReadLn;
end.</lang> Output:
0 0 12 3 4 10 4 2 5 6 1 7 1 12 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 4 4 4 5 6 7 10 12 12
Elena
ELENA 5.0 : <lang elena>import extensions; import system'routines; import extensions'threading; import system'threading;
static sync = new object();
extension op {
sleepSort() { self.forEach:(n) { threadControl.start( { threadControl.sleep(1000 * n); lock(sync) { console.printLine(n) } }) } }
}
public program() {
program_arguments.skipping:1.selectBy(mssgconst toInt<convertorOp>[1]).toArray().sleepSort(); console.readChar()
}</lang>
Elixir
<lang elixir>defmodule Sort do
def sleep_sort(args) do Enum.each(args, fn(arg) -> Process.send_after(self, arg, 5 * arg) end) loop(length(args)) end defp loop(0), do: :ok defp loop(n) do receive do num -> IO.puts num loop(n - 1) end end
end
Sort.sleep_sort [2, 4, 8, 12, 35, 2, 12, 1]</lang>
- Output:
1 2 2 4 8 12 12 35
Emacs Lisp
GNU Emacs supports threads, but it's more straightforward to do this by just using timers.
Evaluate in the *scratch* buffer by typing C-M-x
on the expression:
<lang Lisp>(dolist (i '(3 1 4 1 5 92 65 3 5 89 79 3))
(run-with-timer (* i 0.001) nil 'message "%d" i))</lang>
The output printed in the *Messages* buffer is:
1 [2 times] 3 [3 times] 4 5 [2 times] 65 79 89 92
Erlang
<lang erlang>#!/usr/bin/env escript %% -*- erlang -*- %%! -smp enable -sname sleepsort
main(Args) ->
lists:foreach(fun(Arg) -> timer:send_after(5 * list_to_integer(Arg), self(), Arg) end, Args), loop(length(Args)).
loop(0) ->
ok;
loop(N) ->
receive Num -> io:format("~s~n", [Num]), loop(N - 1) end.</lang>
- Output:
./sleepsort 2 4 8 12 35 2 12 1 1 2 2 4 8 12 12 35
Euphoria
<lang euphoria>include get.e
integer count
procedure sleeper(integer key)
? key count -= 1
end procedure
sequence s, val atom task
s = command_line() s = s[3..$] if length(s)=0 then
puts(1,"Nothing to sort.\n")
else
count = 0 for i = 1 to length(s) do val = value(s[i]) if val[1] = GET_SUCCESS then task = task_create(routine_id("sleeper"),{val[2]}) task_schedule(task,{val[2],val[2]}/10) count += 1 end if end for while count do task_yield() end while
end if</lang>
F#
<lang fsharp> let sleepSort (values: seq<int>) =
values |> Seq.map (fun x -> async { do! Async.Sleep x Console.WriteLine x }) |> Async.Parallel |> Async.Ignore |> Async.RunSynchronously
</lang>
Usage: <lang fsharp> sleepSort [10; 33; 80; 32] 10 32 33 80 </lang>
Factor
<lang Factor> USING: threads calendar concurrency.combinators ;
- sleep-sort ( seq -- ) [ dup seconds sleep . ] parallel-each ;
</lang>
Usage:
<lang Factor> { 1 9 2 6 3 4 5 8 7 0 } sleep-sort </lang>
Fortran
<lang Fortran> program sleepSort
use omp_lib implicit none integer::nArgs,myid,i,stat integer,allocatable::intArg(:) character(len=5)::arg
!$omp master nArgs=command_argument_count() if(nArgs==0)stop ' : No argument is given !' allocate(intArg(nArgs)) do i=1,nArgs call get_command_argument(i, arg)
read(arg,'(I5)',iostat=stat)intArg(i) if(intArg(i)<0 .or. stat/=0) stop&
&' :Only 0 or positive integer allowed !' end do call omp_set_num_threads(nArgs) !$omp end master
!$omp parallel private(myid) myid =omp_get_thread_num() call sleepNprint(intArg(myid+1)) !$omp end parallel
contains
subroutine sleepNprint(nSeconds) integer::nSeconds
call sleep(nSeconds)
print*,nSeconds end subroutine sleepNprint end program sleepSort </lang> Compile and Output:
gfortran -fopenmp sleepSort.f90 -o sleepSort ./sleepSort 0 3 1 4 1 5 9 0 1 1 3 4 5 9
FreeBASIC
Can't use FreeBASIC sleep since it halts the program. Instead it uses a second array filled with times based on the value of number, this array is check against the timer. If the timer is past the stored time the value is printed. <lang freebasic>' version 21-10-2016 ' compile with: fbc -s console ' compile with: fbc -s console -exx (for bondry check on the array's) ' not very well suited for large numbers and large array's ' positive numbers only
Sub sandman(sleepy() As ULong)
Dim As Long lb = LBound(sleepy) Dim As Long ub = UBound(sleepy) Dim As Long i, count = ub Dim As Double wakeup(lb To ub) Dim As Double t = Timer
For i = lb To ub wakeup(i) = sleepy(i) +1 + t Next
Do t = Timer For i = lb To ub If wakeup(i) <= t Then Print Using "####";sleepy(i); wakeup(i) = 1e9 ' mark it as used count = count -1 End If Next Sleep (1 - (Timer - t)) * 300, 1 ' reduce CPU load Loop Until count < lb
End Sub
' ------=< MAIN >=------
Dim As ULong i, arr(10) Dim As ULong lb = LBound(arr) Dim As ULong ub = UBound(arr)
Randomize Timer For i = lb To ub -1 ' leave last one zero
arr(i) = Int(Rnd * 10) +1
Next
Print "unsorted "; For i = lb To ub
Print Using "####";arr(i);
Next Print : Print
Print " sorted "; sandman(arr())
Print : Print
' empty keyboard buffer While InKey <> "" : Wend Print : Print "hit any key to end program" Sleep End</lang>
- Output:
unsorted 5 2 5 6 4 6 9 5 1 2 0 sorted 0 1 2 2 4 5 5 5 6 6 9
Go
<lang go>package main
import ( "fmt" "log" "os" "strconv" "time" )
func main() { out := make(chan uint64) for _, a := range os.Args[1:] { i, err := strconv.ParseUint(a, 10, 64) if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } go func(n uint64) { time.Sleep(time.Duration(n) * time.Millisecond) out <- n }(i) } for _ = range os.Args[1:] { fmt.Println(<-out) } }</lang> Usage and output:
./sleepsort 3 1 4 1 5 9 1 1 3 4 5 9
Using sync.WaitGroup
<lang go>package main
import (
"fmt" "log" "os" "strconv" "sync" "time"
)
func main() {
var wg sync.WaitGroup wg.Add(len(os.Args[1:])) for _,i := range os.Args[1:] { x, err := strconv.ParseUint(i, 10, 64) if err != nil { log.Println(err) } wg.Add(1) go func(i uint64, wg *sync.WaitGroup) { defer wg.Done() time.Sleep(time.Duration(i) * time.Second) fmt.Println(i) }(x, &wg) } wg.Wait()
}</lang>
Usage and output are the same as the version using channels. Note that the original version would sleep for increments of 1 full second, so I made my code do the same.
Groovy
<lang groovy> @Grab(group = 'org.codehaus.gpars', module = 'gpars', version = '1.2.1') import groovyx.gpars.GParsPool
GParsPool.withPool args.size(), {
args.eachParallel { sleep(it.toInteger() * 10) println it }
} </lang>
Sample Run:
> groovy sleepsort.groovy 42 23 16 15 8 4 4 8 15 16 23 42
Haskell
<lang haskell>import System.Environment import Control.Concurrent import Control.Monad
sleepSort :: [Int] -> IO () sleepSort values = do
chan <- newChan forM_ values (\time -> forkIO (threadDelay (50000 * time) >> writeChan chan time)) forM_ values (\_ -> readChan chan >>= print)
main :: IO () main = getArgs >>= sleepSort . map read</lang>
Using mapConcurrently
<lang haskell>import System.Environment import Control.Concurrent import Control.Concurrent.Async
sleepSort :: [Int] -> IO () sleepSort = (() <$) . mapConcurrently (\x -> threadDelay (x*10^4) >> print x)
main :: IO () main = getArgs >>= sleepSort . map read</lang>
This is problematic for inputs with multiple duplicates like [1,2,3,1,4,1,5,1]
because simultaneous print
s are done concurrently and the 1s and newlines get output in jumbled up order. The channels-based version above doesn't have this problem.
Icon and Unicon
The following solution only works in Unicon.
<lang unicon>procedure main(A)
every insert(t:=set(),mkThread(t,!A)) every spawn(!t) # start threads as closely grouped as possible while (*t > 0) do write(<<@)
end
procedure mkThread(t,n) # 10ms delay scale factor
return create (delay(n*10),delete(t,¤t),n@>&main)
end</lang>
Sample run:
->ss 3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 ->
Java
<lang java5>import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
public class SleepSort { public static void sleepSortAndPrint(int[] nums) { final CountDownLatch doneSignal = new CountDownLatch(nums.length); for (final int num : nums) { new Thread(new Runnable() { public void run() { doneSignal.countDown(); try { doneSignal.await();
//using straight milliseconds produces unpredictable //results with small numbers //using 1000 here gives a nifty demonstration Thread.sleep(num * 1000); System.out.println(num); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }).start(); } } public static void main(String[] args) { int[] nums = new int[args.length]; for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) nums[i] = Integer.parseInt(args[i]); sleepSortAndPrint(nums); } }</lang> Output (using "3 1 4 5 2 3 1 6 1 3 2 5 4 6" as arguments):
1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
JavaScript
<lang javascript>Array.prototype.timeoutSort = function (f) {
this.forEach(function (n) {
setTimeout(function () { f(n) }, 5 * n)
});
}
</lang>
Usage and output:
<lang javascript>[1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 3, 4, 5, 2, 0].timeoutSort(function(n) { document.write(n + '
'); })</lang>
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
<lang javascript>Array.prototype.sleepSort = function(callback) {
const res = []; for (let n of this) setTimeout(() => { res.push(n); if (this.length === res.length) callback(res); }, n + 1); return res;
};
[1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 3, 4, 5, 2, 0].sleepSort(console.log); // [ 1, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ] </lang>
jq
Doesn't actually sleep. Instead, iterates reducing the values by one until each is zero.
<lang jq>echo '[5, 1, 3, 2, 11, 6, 4]' | jq ' def f:
if .unsorted == [] then .sorted else { unsorted: [.unsorted[] | .t = .t - 1 | select(.t != 0)] , sorted: (.sorted + [.unsorted[] | .t = .t - 1 | select(.t == 0) | .v]) } | f end;
{unsorted: [.[] | {v: ., t: .}], sorted: []} | f | .[] '</lang>
- Output:
1 2 3 4 5 6 11
Julia
<lang julia>function sleepsort(arr::Vector{<:Real})
out = Vector{eltype(arr)}(0) sizehint!(out, length(arr)) @sync for x in arr @async begin sleep(x) push!(out, x) end end return out
end
v = rand(-10:10, 10) println("# unordered: $v\n -> ordered: ", sleepsort(v))</lang>
- Output:
# unordered: [9, 5, 3, 8, 8, 2, 5, 2, 5, 5] -> ordered: [2, 2, 3, 5, 5, 5, 5, 8, 8, 9]
Kotlin
<lang scala>// version 1.1.51
import kotlin.concurrent.thread
fun sleepSort(list: List<Int>, interval: Long) {
print("Sorted : ") for (i in list) { thread { Thread.sleep(i * interval) print("$i ") } } thread { // print a new line after displaying sorted list Thread.sleep ((1 + list.max()!!) * interval) println() }
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val list = args.map { it.toInt() }.filter { it >= 0 } // ignore negative integers println("Unsorted: ${list.joinToString(" ")}") sleepSort(list, 50)
}</lang>
Sample output:
$ java -jar sleepsort.jar 5 7 -1 2 4 1 8 0 3 9 6 Unsorted: 5 7 2 4 1 8 0 3 9 6 Sorted : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Lua
Here's a slow implementation using only stock C Lua:
<lang lua>function sleeprint(n)
local t0 = os.time() while os.time() - t0 <= n do coroutine.yield(false) end print(n) return true
end
coroutines = {} for i=1, #arg do
wrapped = coroutine.wrap(sleeprint) table.insert(coroutines, wrapped) wrapped(tonumber(arg[i]))
end
done = false while not done do
done = true for i=#coroutines,1,-1 do if coroutines[i]() then table.remove(coroutines, i) else done = false end end
end</lang>
By installing LuaSocket, you can get better than 1-second precision on the clock, and therefore faster output:
<lang lua>socket = require 'socket'
function sleeprint(n)
local t0 = socket.gettime() while (socket.gettime() - t0)*100 <= n do coroutine.yield(false) end print(n) return true
end
coroutines = {} for i=1, #arg do
wrapped = coroutine.wrap(sleeprint) table.insert(coroutines, wrapped) wrapped(tonumber(arg[i]))
end
done = false while not done do
done = true for i=#coroutines,1,-1 do if coroutines[i]() then table.remove(coroutines, i) else done = false end end
end</lang>
Either way, the output is the same:
- Output:
$ lua sleep_sort.lua 3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3 5 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 5 5 6 9
Mathematica
<lang mathematica>SleepSort = RunScheduledTask[Print@#, {#, 1}] & /@ # &; SleepSort@{1, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 3, 4, 5, 2, 0};</lang>
- Output:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NetRexx
As implemented this sample goes beyond the scope of the task as defined; it will handle negative numbers.
<lang NetRexx>/* NetRexx */ options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch
-- ============================================================================= class RSortingSleepsort
properties constant private dflt = '-6 3 1 4 5 2 3 -7 1 6 001 3 -9 2 5 -009 -8 4 6 1 9 8 7 6 5 -7 3 4 5 2 0 -2 -1 -5 -4 -3 -0 000 0' properties indirect startLatch = CountDownLatch doneLatch = CountDownLatch floor = 0 sorted = -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ method main(args = String[]) public static arg = Rexx(args) if arg = then arg = dflt say ' unsorted:' arg say ' sorted:' (RSortingSleepsort()).sleepSort(arg) return -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ method sleepSort(iArg) public setStartLatch(CountDownLatch(1)) -- used to put all threads on hold until we're ready to run setDoneLatch(CountDownLatch(iArg.words())) -- used to indicate all work is done loop mn = 1 to iArg.words() setFloor(getFloor().min(iArg.word(mn))) -- save smallest -ve number so we can use it as a scale for sleep Thread(SortThread(iArg.word(mn))).start() -- loop through input and create a thread for each element end mn getStartLatch().countDown() -- cry 'Havoc', and let slip the dogs of war. do getDoneLatch().await() -- wait for worker threads to complete catch ix = InterruptedException ix.printStackTrace() end return getSorted()
-- ============================================================================= class RSortingSleepsort.SortThread dependent implements Runnable
properties indirect num -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ method SortThread(nm) setNum(nm) return -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ method run() public do parent.getStartLatch().await() -- wait until all threads are constructed sleepTime = getNum() + parent.getFloor().abs() -- shifted by value of smallest number (permits numbers < 0) sleepTime = sleepTime * 250 -- scale up; milliseconds are not granular enough Thread.sleep(sleepTime) -- wait for this number's turn to run catch ie = InterruptedException ie.printStackTrace() end do protect parent -- lock the parent to prevent collisions parent.setSorted((parent.getSorted() num).strip()) -- stow the number in the results List end parent.getDoneLatch().countDown() -- this one's done; decrement the latch return
</lang> Output:
unsorted: -6 3 1 4 5 2 3 -7 1 6 001 3 -9 2 5 -009 -8 4 6 1 9 8 7 6 5 -7 3 4 5 2 0 -2 -1 -5 -4 -3 -0 000 0 sorted: -9 -009 -8 -7 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 000 0 0 -0 1 1 001 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 8 9
Nim
Compile with nim --threads:on c sleepsort
:
<lang nim>import os, strutils
proc single(n: int) =
sleep n echo n
proc main =
var thr = newSeq[TThread[int]](paramCount()) for i,c in commandLineParams(): thr[i].createThread(single, c.parseInt) thr.joinThreads
main()</lang> Usage:
$ ./sleepsort 5 1 3 2 11 6 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 11
Objeck
<lang objeck> use System.Concurrency; use Collection;
bundle Default {
class Item from Thread { @value : Int; New(value : Int) { Parent(); @value := value; }
method : public : Run(param : System.Base) ~ Nil { Sleep(1000 * @value); @value->PrintLine(); } }
class SleepSort { function : Main(args : String[]) ~ Nil { items := Vector->New(); each(i : args) { items->AddBack(Item->New(args[i]->ToInt())); }; each(i : items) { items->Get(i)->As(Item)->Execute(Nil); }; } }
} </lang>
Objective-C
<lang objc>#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
NSOperationQueue *queue = [[NSOperationQueue alloc] init]; while (--argc) { int i = atoi(argv[argc]); [queue addOperationWithBlock: ^{ sleep(i); NSLog(@"%d\n", i); }]; } [queue waitUntilAllOperationsAreFinished];
}</lang> Rather than having multiple operations that sleep, we could also dispatch the tasks after a delay: <lang objc>#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
while (--argc) { int i = atoi(argv[argc]); dispatch_after(dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, i * NSEC_PER_SEC), dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{ NSLog(@"%d\n", i); }); }
}</lang>
Oforth
Instead of printing numbers, each task sends its integer into a channel (after sleeping 20 * n milliseconds). This allows the main task to create a new sorted list with those integers.
20 milliseconds is used to (try to) handle scheduler tick on Windows systems (around 15 ms). On Linux systems (after kernel 2.6.8), this value can be smaller.
<lang Oforth>import: parallel
- sleepSort(l)
| ch n |
Channel new ->ch l forEach: n [ #[ n dup 20 * sleep ch send drop ] & ] ListBuffer newSize(l size) #[ ch receive over add ] times(l size) ;</lang>
- Output:
100 seq 100 seq + sleepSort println [1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 10, 11, 11, 12, 12, 13, 13, 14, 14, 15, 15, 16, 16, 17, 17, 18, 18, 19, 19, 20, 20, 21, 21, 22, 22, 23, 23, 24, 24, 25, 2 5, 26, 26, 27, 27, 28, 28, 29, 29, 30, 30, 31, 31, 32, 32, 33, 33, 34, 34, 35, 35, 36, 36, 37, 37, 38, 38, 39, 39, 40, 40, 41, 41, 42, 42, 43, 43, 44, 44, 45, 45, 46, 46, 47, 47, 4 8, 48, 49, 49, 50, 50, 51, 51, 52, 52, 53, 53, 54, 54, 55, 55, 56, 56, 57, 57, 58, 58, 59, 59, 60, 60, 61, 61, 62, 62, 63, 63, 64, 64, 65, 65, 66, 66, 67, 67, 68, 68, 69, 69, 70, 7 0, 71, 71, 72, 72, 73, 73, 74, 74, 75, 75, 76, 76, 77, 77, 78, 78, 79, 79, 80, 80, 81, 81, 82, 82, 83, 83, 84, 84, 85, 85, 86, 86, 87, 87, 88, 88, 89, 89, 90, 90, 91, 91, 92, 92, 9 3, 93, 94, 94, 95, 95, 96, 96, 97, 97, 98, 98, 99, 99, 100, 100]
Pascal
my limit under linux was 4000 threads nearly 2 GB. <lang pascal> program sleepsort; {$IFDEF FPC}
{$MODE DELPHI} {$Optimization ON,ALL}
{$ElSE}
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
{$ENDIF} uses
{$IFDEF UNIX} cthreads, {$ENDIF} SysUtils;
const
HiLimit = 40;
type
tCombineForOneThread = record cft_count : Uint64; cft_ThreadID: NativeUint; cft_ThreadHandle: NativeUint; end; pThreadBlock = ^tCombineForOneThread;
var
SortIdx : array of INteger; ThreadBlocks : array of tCombineForOneThread; gblThreadCount, Finished: Uint32;
procedure PrepareThreads(thdCount:NativeInt); var i : NativeInt; Begin For i := 0 to thdCount-1 do ThreadBlocks[i].cft_count:= random(2*HiLimit); end;
procedure TestRunThd(parameter: pointer); var pThdBlk: pThreadBlock; fi: NativeInt; begin pThdBlk := @ThreadBlocks[NativeUint(parameter)]; with pThdBlk^ do begin sleep(40*cft_count+1); fi := Finished-1; //write(fi:5,cft_count:8,#13); InterLockedDecrement(Finished); SortIdx[fi]:= NativeUint(parameter); end; EndThread(0); end;
procedure Test; var j,UsedThreads: NativeInt; begin randomize; UsedThreads:= GblThreadCount; Finished :=UsedThreads; PrepareThreads(UsedThreads); j := 0; while (j < UsedThreads) do begin with ThreadBlocks[j] do begin cft_ThreadHandle := BeginThread(@TestRunThd, Pointer(j), cft_ThreadID,16384 {stacksize} ); If cft_ThreadHandle = 0 then break; end; Inc(j); end; writeln(j); UsedThreads := j; Finished :=UsedThreads; repeat sleep(1); until finished = 0; For j := 0 to UsedThreads-1 do CloseThread(ThreadBlocks[j].cft_ThreadID);
//output of sleep-sorted data For j := UsedThreads-1 downto 1 do write(ThreadBlocks[SortIdx[j]].cft_count,','); writeln(ThreadBlocks[SortIdx[0]].cft_count); end;
begin
randomize; gblThreadCount := Hilimit; Writeln('Testthreads : ',gblThreadCount); setlength(ThreadBlocks,gblThreadCount); setlength(SortIdx,gblThreadCount); Test;
setlength(ThreadBlocks, 0); {$IFDEF WINDOWS} readln; {$ENDIF}
end.</lang>
- Output:
time ./sleepsort Testthreads : 40 40 1,8,9,10,11,12,12,13,14,18,24,24,24,26,28,35,35,37,42,49,50,52,54,54,56,57,59,60,61,62,64,69,69,71,72,73,76,77,78,79 real 0m3,164s
Perl
Basically the C code. <lang Perl>1 while ($_ = shift and @ARGV and !fork); sleep $_; print "$_\n"; wait;</lang>
A more optimal solution makes use of Coro, a cooperative threading library. It has the added effect of being much faster, fully deterministic (sleep is not exact), and it allows you to easily collect the return value:
<lang Perl>use Coro;
$ret = Coro::Channel->new;
@nums = qw(1 32 2 59 2 39 43 15 8 9 12 9 11);
for my $n (@nums){ async { Coro::cede for 1..$n; $ret->put($n); } }
print $ret->get,"\n" for 1..@nums;</lang>
Phix
Copy of Euphoria <lang Phix>integer count
procedure sleeper(integer key)
? key count -= 1
end procedure
sequence s, val atom task
s = command_line() s = s[3..$] if length(s)=0 then
puts(1,"Nothing to sort.\n")
else
count = 0 for i = 1 to length(s) do val = value(s[i]) if val[1] = GET_SUCCESS then task = task_create(routine_id("sleeper"),{val[2]}) task_schedule(task,{val[2],val[2]}/10) count += 1 end if end for while count do task_yield() end while
end if</lang>
PicoLisp
Sleeping in main process
<lang PicoLisp>(de sleepSort (Lst)
(make (for (I . N) Lst (task (- I) (* N 100) N N I I (link N) (pop 'Lst) (task (- I)) ) ) (wait NIL (not Lst)) ) )</lang>
Sleeping in child processes
<lang PicoLisp>(de sleepSort (Lst)
(make (for N Lst (task (pipe (wait (* N 100))) N N (link N) (pop 'Lst) (task (close @)) ) ) (wait NIL (not Lst)) ) )</lang>
Output in both cases:
: (sleepSort (3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5)) -> (1 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 9)
Just printing (no sorted result list)
Basically the C code. <lang PicoLisp>(for N (3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5)
(unless (fork) (call 'sleep N) (msg N) (bye) ) )</lang>
Output:
1 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 9
Pike
<lang Pike>
- !/usr/bin/env pike
int main(int argc, array(string) argv) {
foreach(argv[1..], string value) { int v = (int)value; if(v<0) continue; call_out(print, v, value); } return -1;
}
void print(string value) {
write("%s\n", value); if(find_call_out(print)==-1) exit(0); return;
} </lang> Output :
$ ./sleep-sort.pike 4 5 -3 1 2 7 6 1 2 4 5 6 7
Prolog
Works with SWI-Prolog. <lang Prolog>sleep_sort(L) :- thread_pool_create(rosetta, 1024, []) , maplist(initsort, L, LID), maplist(thread_join, LID, _LStatus), thread_pool_destroy(rosetta).
initsort(V, Id) :- thread_create_in_pool(rosetta, (sleep(V), writeln(V)), Id, []).
</lang> Output :
sleep_sort([5, 1, 3, 2, 11, 6, 3, 4]). 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 11 true.
PureBasic
<lang PureBasic>NewMap threads()
Procedure Foo(n)
Delay(n) PrintN(Str(n))
EndProcedure
If OpenConsole()
For i=1 To CountProgramParameters() threads(Str(i)) = CreateThread(@Foo(), Val(ProgramParameter())) Next ForEach threads() WaitThread(threads()) Next Print("Press ENTER to exit"): Input()
EndIf</lang>
Sleep_sort.exe 3 1 4 1 5 9 1 1 3 4 5 9 Press ENTER to exit
Python
Python: Using threading.Timer
<lang python>from time import sleep from threading import Timer
def sleepsort(values):
sleepsort.result = [] def add1(x): sleepsort.result.append(x) mx = values[0] for v in values: if mx < v: mx = v Timer(v, add1, [v]).start() sleep(mx+1) return sleepsort.result
if __name__ == '__main__':
x = [3,2,4,7,3,6,9,1] if sleepsort(x) == sorted(x): print('sleep sort worked for:',x) else: print('sleep sort FAILED for:',x)</lang>
- Sample output
sleep sort worked for: [3, 2, 4, 7, 3, 6, 9, 1]
Python v3.5+: Using asyncio
Since the introduction of async/await syntax, the implementation could be a sole translation from the original version in Bash:
<lang python>#!/usr/bin/env python3 from asyncio import run, sleep, wait from sys import argv
async def f(n):
await sleep(n) print(n)
if __name__ == '__main__':
run(wait(list(map(f, map(int, argv[1:])))))</lang>
Example usage:
$ ./sleepsort.py 5 3 6 3 6 3 1 4 7 1 3 3 3 4 5 6 6 7
Racket
<lang racket>
- lang racket
- accepts a list to sort
(define (sleep-sort lst)
(define done (make-channel)) (for ([elem lst]) (thread (λ () (sleep elem) (channel-put done elem)))) (for/list ([_ (length lst)]) (channel-get done)))
- outputs '(2 5 5 7 8 9 10)
(sleep-sort '(5 8 2 7 9 10 5)) </lang>
Raku
(formerly Perl 6)
<lang perl6>await map -> $delay { start { sleep $delay ; say $delay } },
<6 8 1 12 2 14 5 2 1 0>;</lang>
- Output:
0 1 1 2 2 5 6 8 12 14
This can also be written using reactive programming:
<lang perl6>#!/usr/bin/env raku use v6; react whenever Supply.from-list(@*ARGS).start({ .&sleep // +$_ }).flat { .say }</lang>
- Output:
$ ./sleep-sort 1 3 5 6 2 4 1 2 3 4 5 6
REXX
This sort will accept any manner of numbers, or for that matter, any character string as well.
REXX isn't particular what is being sorted.
<lang rexx>/*REXX program implements a sleep sort (with numbers entered from the command line (CL).*/
numeric digits 300 /*over the top, but what the hey! */
/* (above) ··· from vaudeville. */
@.= /*placeholder for the array of numbers.*/ stuff= 1e9 50 5 40 4 1 100 30 3 12 2 8 9 7 6 6 10 20 0 /*alphabetically ··· so far.*/ parse arg numbers /*obtain optional arguments from the CL*/ if numbers= then numbers= stuff /*Not specified? Then use the default.*/ N= words(numbers) /*N is the number of numbers in list. */ w= length(N) /*width of N (used for nice output). */ parse upper version !ver . /*obtain which REXX we're running under*/ !regina= ('REXX-REGINA'==left(!ver, 11) ) /*indicate (or not) if this is Regina. */ say N 'numbers to be sorted:' numbers /*informative informational information*/
/*from department of redundancy depart.*/ do j=1 for N /*let's start to boogie─woogie da sort.*/ @.j= word(numbers, j) /*plug in a single number at a time. */ if datatype(@.j, 'N') then @.j= @.j / 1 /*normalize it if it's a numeric number*/ if !regina then call fork /*only REGINA REXX supports FORK BIF.*/ call sortItem j /*start a sort for an array number. */ end /*j*/
do forever while \inOrder(N) /*wait for the sorts to complete. */ call delay 1 /*one second is minimum effective time.*/ end /*forever while*/ /*well heck, other than zero seconds. */
m= max(length(@.1), length(@.N) ) /*width of smallest or largest number. */ say; say 'after sort:' /*display a blank line and a title. */
do k=1 for N /*list the (sorted) array's elements.*/ say left(, 20) 'array element' right(k, w) '───►' right(@.k, m) end /*k*/
exit /*stick a fork in it, we're all done. */ /*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/ sortItem: procedure expose @.; parse arg ? /*sorts a single (numeric) item. */
do Asort=1 until \switched /*sort unsorted array until it's sorted*/ switched= 0 /*it's all hunky─dorey, happy─dappy ···*/ do i=1 while @.i\== & \switched if @.? >= @.i then iterate /*item is in order. */ parse value @.? @.i with @.i @.? switched= 1 /* [↑] swapped one.*/ end /*i*/ if Asort//?==0 then call delay switched /*sleep if last item*/ end /*Asort*/ return /*Sleeping Beauty awakes. Not to worry: (c)=circa 1697.*/
/*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/ inOrder: procedure expose @.; parse arg howMany /*is the array in numerical order? */
do m=1 for howMany-1; next= m+1; if @.m>@.next then return 0 /*¬ in order*/ end /*m*/ /*keep looking for fountain of youth. */ return 1 /*yes, indicate with an indicator. */</lang>
Programming note: this REXX program makes use of DELAY BIF which delays (sleeps) for a specified amount of seconds.
Some REXXes don't have a DELAY BIF, so one is included here ──► DELAY.REX.
- output when using the internal default input:
19 numbers to be sorted: 1E9 50 5 40 4 1 100 30 3 12 2 8 9 7 6 6 10 20 0 after sort: array element 1 ───► 0 array element 2 ───► 1 array element 3 ───► 2 array element 4 ───► 3 array element 5 ───► 4 array element 6 ───► 5 array element 7 ───► 6 array element 8 ───► 6 array element 9 ───► 7 array element 10 ───► 8 array element 11 ───► 9 array element 12 ───► 10 array element 13 ───► 12 array element 14 ───► 20 array element 15 ───► 30 array element 16 ───► 40 array element 17 ───► 50 array element 18 ───► 100 array element 19 ───► 1000000000
Ruby
<lang ruby>require 'thread'
nums = ARGV.collect(&:to_i) sorted = [] mutex = Mutex.new
threads = nums.collect do |n|
Thread.new do sleep 0.01 * n mutex.synchronize {sorted << n} end
end threads.each {|t| t.join}
p sorted</lang>
Example
$ ruby sleepsort.rb 3 1 4 5 2 3 1 6 1 3 2 5 4 6 [1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6]
Rust
<lang rust>use std::thread;
fn sleepsort<I: Iterator<Item=u32>>(nums: I) {
let threads: Vec<_> = nums.map(|n| thread::spawn(move || { thread::sleep_ms(n); println!("{}", n); })).collect(); for t in threads { t.join(); }
}
fn main() {
sleepsort(std::env::args().skip(1).map(|s| s.parse().unwrap()));
}</lang> Output:
$ ./sleepsort 50 34 43 3 2 2 3 34 43 50
Scala
<lang scala>object SleepSort {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { val nums = args.map(_.toInt) sort(nums) Thread.sleep(nums.max * 21) // Keep the JVM alive for the example }
def sort(nums: Seq[Int]): Unit = nums.foreach(i => new Thread { override def run() { Thread.sleep(i * 20) // just `i` is unpredictable with small numbers print(s"$i ") } }.start())
}</lang>
- Output:
<lang bash>$ scala SleepSort 1 3 6 0 9 7 4 2 5 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 9 </lang>
Sidef
<lang ruby>ARGV.map{.to_i}.map{ |i|
{Sys.sleep(i); say i}.fork;
}.each{.wait};</lang>
- Output:
% sidef test.sf 5 1 3 2 11 6 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 11
Simula
<lang simula>SIMULATION BEGIN
PROCESS CLASS SORTITEM(N); INTEGER N; BEGIN HOLD(N); OUTINT(N, 3); END;
INTEGER I; FOR I := 3, 2, 4, 7, 3, 6, 9, 1 DO BEGIN REF(SORTITEM) SI; SI :- NEW SORTITEM(I); ACTIVATE SI; END; HOLD(100000); OUTIMAGE;
END;</lang>
- Output:
1 2 3 3 4 6 7 9
SNUSP
Bloated SNUSP is ideally suited to this task, since this the variant adds multithreading and an additional dimension of data space. Sleep time is simulated by the loop delay required to copy each cell value, thereby ensuring that smaller values are printed earlier than larger values. This program requires a Bloated SNUSP interpreter which returns zero on input end-of-file. <lang SNUSP>
/$>\ input until eof #/?<\?,/ foreach: fork \ &/:+ copy and\ /:\?-; delay / \.# print and exit thread
</lang>
Legend:
- & - SPLIT creates a new thread. Like @ ENTER, it skips one cell of code space to start its continuation.
- : ; - UP and DOWN are equivalent to < > LEFT and RIGHT, but moves the data pointer in the second dimension.
- # - in Bloated SNUSP, LEAVE only terminates the current thread. The overall program only exits when all threads have quit.
Swift
<lang Swift>import Foundation
for i in [5, 2, 4, 6, 1, 7, 20, 14] {
let time = dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, Int64(i * Int(NSEC_PER_SEC))) dispatch_after(time, dispatch_get_main_queue()) { print(i) }
}
CFRunLoopRun()</lang>
- Output:
1 2 4 5 6 7 14 20
Tcl
Tcl 8.5
<lang tcl>#!/bin/env tclsh set count 0 proc process val {
puts $val incr ::count
}
- Schedule the output of the values
foreach val $argv {
after [expr {$val * 10}] [list process $val]
}
- Run event loop until all values output...
while {$count < $argc} {
vwait count
}</lang> Demo:
bash$ sleepsort.tcl 3 1 4 5 2 3 1 6 1 3 2 5 4 6 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6
Tcl 8.6: coroutine
<lang tcl>#! /usr/bin/env tclsh
package require Tcl 8.6
- By aspect (https://wiki.tcl-lang.org/page/aspect). Modified slightly.
- 1. Schedule N delayed calls to our own coroutine.
- 2. Yield N times to grab the scheduled values. Print each.
- 3. Store the sorted list in $varName.
proc sleep-sort {ls varName} {
foreach x $ls { after $x [info coroutine] $x } set $varName [lmap x $ls { set newX [yield] puts $newX lindex $newX }]
}
- Ensure the list is suitable for use with [sleep-sort].
proc validate ls {
if {[llength $ls] == 0} { error {list is empty} } foreach x $ls { if {![string is integer -strict $x] || $x < 0} { error [list invalid value: $x] } } return $ls
}
coroutine c sleep-sort [validate $argv] ::sorted vwait sorted</lang> Demo:
$ ./sleepsort.tcl 1 2 100 40 76 0 0 0 200 199 0 0 0 1 2 40 76 100 199 200
UNIX Shell
<lang bash>f() {
sleep "$1" echo "$1"
} while [ -n "$1" ] do
f "$1" & shift
done wait</lang> Usage and output:
sh sleepsort.sh 3 1 4 1 5 9 1 1 3 4 5 9
Wren
More of a simulation than a 'true' sleep sort. <lang ecmascript>import "timer" for Timer import "io" for Stdout import "os" for Process
var args = Process.arguments var n = args.count if (n < 2) Fiber.abort("There must be at least two arguments passed.") var list = args.map{ |a| Num.fromString(a) }.toList if (list.any { |i| i == null || !i.isInteger || i < 0 } ) {
Fiber.abort("All arguments must be non-negative integers.")
} var max = list.reduce { |acc, i| acc = (i > acc) ? i : acc } var fibers = List.filled(max+1, null) System.print("Before: %(list.join(" "))") for (i in list) {
var sleepSort = Fiber.new { |i| Timer.sleep(1000) Fiber.yield(i) } fibers[i] = sleepSort
} System.write("After : ") for (i in 0..max) {
var fib = fibers[i] if (fib) { System.write("%(fib.call(i)) ") Stdout.flush() }
} System.print()</lang>
- Output:
Sample run:
$ wren sleepsort.wren 1 8 3 7 4 6 Before: 1 8 3 7 4 6 After : 1 3 4 6 7 8
zkl
<lang zkl>vm.arglist.apply(fcn(n){ Atomic.sleep(n); print(n) }.launch); Atomic.waitFor(fcn{ vm.numThreads == 1 }); Atomic.sleep(2); println();</lang>
- Output:
$ zkl bbb 7 6 9 2 4 8 1 3 5 123456789 $
- Programming Tasks
- Sorting Algorithms
- Sorting
- Ada
- APL
- Bash
- BBC BASIC
- Brainf***
- C
- C sharp
- C++
- Clojure
- CoffeeScript
- Common Lisp
- D
- Dart
- Delphi
- Elena
- Elixir
- Emacs Lisp
- Erlang
- Euphoria
- F Sharp
- Factor
- Fortran
- FreeBASIC
- Go
- Groovy
- Haskell
- Icon
- Unicon
- Java
- JavaScript
- Jq
- Julia
- Kotlin
- Lua
- Mathematica
- NetRexx
- Nim
- Objeck
- Objective-C
- Oforth
- Pascal
- Perl
- Phix
- PicoLisp
- Pike
- Prolog
- PureBasic
- Python
- Racket
- Raku
- REXX
- Ruby
- Rust
- Scala
- Sidef
- Simula
- SNUSP
- Swift
- Tcl
- UNIX Shell
- Wren
- Zkl
- GUISS/Omit
- Axe/Omit