User talk:Insolor

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 22:10, 3 March 2012 by rosettacode>Local2 (general confirmation about euphoria code changes to bresenham example)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Just a little note: when editing, it's polite to include something meaningful in the summary that says what you've done -- for example, you have entered "Euphoria example added" several times, but when editing anything, it would be nice for you to summarize what you've done. Adding the summary takes little time, and it really helps others.

Under Special:Preferences is an option for the wiki to remind you to enter a summary if you forget; I highly recommend turning it on. (Look for "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" under the "Editing" tab.) -- Erik Siers 02:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. Though I have some difficulties with English (it is not my native language) I will make an effort. Insolor 11:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I understand your changes to bresenham line algorithm code in euphoria from today. I was exhausted after doing that and the changes you made make good sense to me, I am glad you took a look, thanks! --Local2 22:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)