Talk:Rosetta Code/Find bare lang tags

From Rosetta Code

Draft status

This should remain a draft task until such time as there are a number of implementations (4, perhaps?) of which at least one should do the extra credit item. (Once that's been reached, just remove the “draft” word from the leading template declaration. Hope the task graduates soon!) –Donal Fellows 21:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Fix it please!

Can someone please roll back my edit? I was attempting to put the task data within the script, and that backfired royally. here's a raw paste of the AutoHotkey task... --Crazyfirex 23:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I managed it myself, but can't put the AutoHotkey back... --Crazyfirex 23:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I have restored your AutoHotkey code, with a different wiki syntax: I used <pre><nowiki>...</nowiki></pre>, not <lang AutoHotkey>...</lang>, but there is no syntax highlighting. --Kernigh 02:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The easiest way out is to go for the full extra credit so that you pull the data from RC rather than supplying it. :-) –Donal Fellows 09:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
And I apologize for the load this puts on the RC server as my code goes through and finds things to fix… –Donal Fellows 12:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Meh. I'm pretty confident the server could take a full Slashdotting or Redditing. Your puny little script means nothing to me. ;P --Michael Mol 13:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Notwithstanding Michael's confidence, I put test results here so that people don't run this needlessly. CRGreathouse 01:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Just noticed that something has gone wrong again following the Perl 6 -> Raku renaming exercise, though it's difficult to say what it is. Might be best to revert the last two edits and make the changes manually. --PureFox (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Doh!, Yeah that go completely screwed up. give me a few minutes. --Thundergnat (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok, should be better. Thanks for the heads-up --Thundergnat (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Yep, it's fine again now. A tough one to anticipate! --PureFox (talk) 17:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)