Hello

My code http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Roman_numerals/Encode#Prolog works in both ways Roman => Arabic and Arabic => Roman. It can be published in this page. user:Trap D 13/05/2011 18:25

## Roman numeral numbers[edit]

I feel that any legal Roman numeral number (such as **IIII** should be converted correctly and without error. The Romans started using **IV** (and others) after they realized the practicability of shortening their numbers, especially those having **8**s in them; easily justified when chiseling those numbers in stone or scribing them in wet clay.

Also, numbers such as **IIXX** should also be converted correctly, as they do appear on old structures and tombstones. Even though modern rules say such a construct may be invalid, the number still has an equivalent decimal number. -- Gerard Schildberger 03:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Furthermore, the Latin word for **eighteen** is **duodeviginti** which literally means **two-from-twenty**, or in Roman numbers; **IIXX**. -- Gerard Schildberger 21:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

## asking for help[edit]

Does anyone know how to fix a problem I'm having with the overbar template which, for some reason, decides to italicize the text after the overbarred characters "for twenty-thousand"?

The offending code is in the REXX program, version 4. People should never give a loaded gun to kids. Pardon me if this isn't the right place to ask this type of question. I couldn't find any other usage of overbars in Rossetta Code.

I can "fix" the overbar/italicizing problem by putting the "for twenty-thousand" on a new line (via the html "br").

Also, I would like to express how to display an HTML tag without HTML "using" it (as in the previous line). I assume that there's some type of escape character(s). -- Gerard Schildberger 03:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

It was a stray newline in the Template:Overline which I just now fixed. If you want to talk about HTML then you can escape it in the usual fashion, &br>, or you can use <nowiki><br></nowiki>. HTML inside of <lang> blocks is also not interpreted. —Kevin Reid 19:37, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

- Thanks for the fix and the hints (albeit a wee bit late for the gratitude). -- Gerard Schildberger 07:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

## Roman numeral, returning an integer[edit]

This task asks to take a Roman numeral (as its argument) and return a numeric decimal integer. This assumes that the Roman numeral is an integer.

What if the Roman numeral contains (or is) a fraction?

I presume then, that Roman numerals to be checked won't have fractions. The Romans had a base **12** fractional system. One-twelfth (fraction) is an *ounce* which we still use in (for weight) pounds and ounces, where the troy pound contains 12 ounces. An **ounce** is also used as a unit of time. -- Gerard Schildberger 07:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

- We aren't doing fractions here. In general "Roman numerals" refers to the the integers. --Mwn3d 19:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)