Talk:Rare numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→Tweaks, Go: response to inquiry
m (→Tweaks, F# (v2): updated output) |
m (→Tweaks, Go: response to inquiry) |
||
Line 480:
:As you say there are memory problems when trying to go above 15 digits, though I see that Nigel has today posted a new F# version which has managed to reach 17 digits without using Cartesian products. So I think we're going to have to take another look at it anyway. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
:: The original version of your 2nd Go program runs about 2-3 seconds slower than the version I put at the Tio.run link. So these tweaks are not much of an improvement. Thanks so much for sharing your version. Not sure why it would go slower on your core i7. I just installed Go for the first time at v 1.13.1. I am careful to keep any other programs from executing concurrently that might interfere with the timing measurements. The full name of my cpu is i7-7700 @ 3.6Ghz. Operating on Win10. It is not overclocked, I have not verified it's speed with any benchmarking software. --[[User:Enter your username|Enter your username]] ([[User talk:Enter your username|talk]]) 04:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
| |||