Talk:Minimal numbers of three lists at same position

Duplicate task

This is effectively a duplicate of the Minimum_numbers_of_three_lists task except that had lists of 5 numbers and this one has 9 numbers. --PureFox (talk) 16:40, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I have to be honest. These trivial variations are getting a bit discouraging. It seems I spend most of my time here smashing out the same code over and over for tasks that differ only in a few minor details. I think it's time the community put the foot down and said "enough of this". Thebigh (talk) 19:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

You can have my vote for deletion too. In fact I'm surprised we haven't seen Minim(um/al) number of four lists [at the same position], Minim(um/al) number of five lists [at the same position], Minim(um/al) number of six lists [at the same position], ... --Pete Lomax (talk) 22:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)