Talk:Find the intersection of two lines: Difference between revisions

m (→‎a REXX version of a REXX version: amazing rewrite to my DISliking)
(→‎a REXX version of a REXX version: added a peer comment.)
Line 91:
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Find_the_intersection_of_two_lines#version_2
::*  Any opinions from any peers? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 06:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 
-----
 
::: There is no reason to take it personally. &nbsp; It wasn't meant as a criticism, it is just another version in a different style, albeit a fair number of (style) differences. &nbsp; <u>Everybody's</u> code can be improved (as least, the style can be changed). &nbsp; In this case, I elided a few superfluous statements, which, in my opinion, didn't add anything to the REXX program or make it easier to understand/peruse. &nbsp; I didn't appreciate your style of capitalization, misaligned DO-END statements (and the intervening/encapsulating REXX statements), split IF-THEN clauses, and much more. &nbsp; &nbsp; But, that's only my opinion and preferences, &nbsp; I merely added a version that I found easier to read and understand (and I hoped others will appreciate this version), and I also removed superfluous DO-END blocks and such. &nbsp; Note that this re-written REXX version was added in the &nbsp; ''talk'' &nbsp; section, not on the &nbsp; ''page'' &nbsp; section so as to not clutter up the main page. &nbsp; I found that that particular REXX version was so difficult to follow and understand (the IF logic) with all the multiple misaligned DO-END and compound IF THEN-ELSE statements. &nbsp; The version (above) that I re-wrote speaks to style and understandability. &nbsp; There are many styles to write REXX in, and this is just one of them. &nbsp; Nobody's style is everybody's cup of tea. &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 
-----