Talk:Constrained random points on a circle: Revision history

16 November 2016

• curprev 00:3200:32, 16 November 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 10,124 bytes +4‎ →‎Main formulae rendered invisible to many browsers by cosmetic edits
• curprev 00:3200:32, 16 November 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 10,120 bytes +420‎ →‎Main formulae rendered invisible to many browsers by cosmetic edits

21 September 2016

• curprev 09:1209:12, 21 September 2016‎ Hout talk contribs‎ 9,700 bytes +687‎ Formulae rendered invisible to many browsers by cosmetic edits on 07:56, 30 April 2016

23 April 2012

• curprev 16:5916:59, 23 April 2012‎ rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger‎ m 9,013 bytes +592‎ →‎Not 100 points: added a couple of comments on point counting. -- ~~~~

28 June 2011

• curprev 21:2421:24, 28 June 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ m 8,421 bytes +12‎ →‎C code: done
• curprev 20:0920:09, 28 June 2011‎ rosettacode>Ledrug‎ 8,409 bytes +226‎ →‎C code: new section

4 November 2010

• curprev 13:3013:30, 4 November 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ m 8,183 bytes 0‎ moved Talk:Constrained Random Points on a Circle to Talk:Constrained random points on a circle: Standardize capitalization

9 September 2010

• curprev 07:1307:13, 9 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ 8,183 bytes +59‎ →‎Task Description: I agree

8 September 2010

• curprev 23:1423:14, 8 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Cferri‎ m 8,124 bytes +13‎ →‎Task Description
• curprev 23:1323:13, 8 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Cferri‎ 8,111 bytes +906‎ Task description thought

4 September 2010

• curprev 00:1400:14, 4 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 7,205 bytes +231‎ →‎Disappearing code?: it's still good to let us know

3 September 2010

• curprev 22:2222:22, 3 September 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 6,974 bytes +114‎ →‎Disappearing code?
• curprev 21:3921:39, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Mwn3d‎ 6,860 bytes +341‎ →‎Disappearing code?: it doesnt look like it was ever there.
• curprev 19:1619:16, 3 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ 6,519 bytes +402‎ →‎Uniform distribution: radial distribution
• curprev 18:0418:04, 3 September 2010‎ Rdm talk contribs‎ 6,117 bytes +414‎ →‎Disappearing code?: new section
• curprev 18:0218:02, 3 September 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 5,703 bytes +200‎ →‎Uniform distribution: atan?
• curprev 16:3416:34, 3 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ 5,503 bytes +178‎ →‎Uniform distribution: polar coordinates are not necessarily an error.
• curprev 16:3116:31, 3 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ 5,325 bytes +420‎ →‎Not 100 points: you can have exactly 100 points with a good RNG
• curprev 15:4315:43, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ m 4,905 bytes +25‎ sign my previous comment
• curprev 15:0715:07, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 4,880 bytes +439‎ →‎Uniform distribution: Subtle errors are possible
• curprev 14:1814:18, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ m 4,441 bytes +103‎ →‎Uniform distribution
• curprev 14:1214:12, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ 4,338 bytes +278‎ →‎Uniform distribution: some math to demonstrate the bias
• curprev 13:5513:55, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ 4,060 bytes +110‎ →‎Not 100 points
• curprev 13:5113:51, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ m 3,950 bytes +24‎ →‎Uniform distribution
• curprev 13:3413:34, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ 3,926 bytes +75‎ →‎Uniform distribution
• curprev 13:3013:30, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Davewhipp‎ 3,851 bytes +1,757‎ No edit summary
• curprev 12:2712:27, 3 September 2010‎ MikeMol talk contribs‎ 2,094 bytes +329‎ →‎Uniform distribution: new section
• curprev 11:0011:00, 3 September 2010‎ rosettacode>Dkf‎ 1,765 bytes +1,320‎ →‎How to check the code: new section
• curprev 10:5810:58, 3 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ m 445 bytes +30‎ →‎Not 100 points: clarified which output I've meant
• curprev 10:5510:55, 3 September 2010‎ Ce talk contribs‎ 415 bytes +415‎ Less than 100 points in the output