Talk:Arena storage pool: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Overlapping?: Overlap, yes, subsume, no) |
(→the REXX language, use of garbage collection: aded a new section.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Isn't this a little bit overlapping [[Memory Allocation]]? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 11:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC) |
Isn't this a little bit overlapping [[Memory Allocation]]? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 11:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
: Yes. However, for languages that deal with low-level memory handling (notably [[C]]) it's quite a different thing. They're certainly not worth merging, though cross-referencing might be a good idea. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
: Yes. However, for languages that deal with low-level memory handling (notably [[C]]) it's quite a different thing. They're certainly not worth merging, though cross-referencing might be a good idea. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
==the REXX language, use of garbage collection== |
|||
Recently, the REXX entry was flagged as incorrect with the text: |
|||
:* ''In this explanation, a garbage collector is mentioned, while the rest of this story denies the presence of that.'' |
|||
Where does "the rest of the story" even deny the presence of garbage collection? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:36, 1 September 2014
Was this actually supposed to be a task? --Mwn3d 14:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
User:Dmitry-kazakov has tended to a descriptive-and-task style before, e.g. Event. Given that it has a "Task" heading, this was clearly intended to be a task. I'll add the template. --Kevin Reid 15:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Overlapping?
Isn't this a little bit overlapping Memory Allocation? --ShinTakezou 11:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. However, for languages that deal with low-level memory handling (notably C) it's quite a different thing. They're certainly not worth merging, though cross-referencing might be a good idea. –Donal Fellows 00:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
the REXX language, use of garbage collection
Recently, the REXX entry was flagged as incorrect with the text:
- In this explanation, a garbage collector is mentioned, while the rest of this story denies the presence of that.
Where does "the rest of the story" even deny the presence of garbage collection? -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)