Anonymous user
Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
m
forgot signature
m (Oops, wrong name ;-)) |
m (forgot signature) |
||
Line 50:
:::"X, and Y would rather be together than with their current respective partners"
::Where X and Y are not of the same sex and are the found names violating stability. The PicoLisp error message says "X likes Y1 better than Y2", which may well be the case, but does not point out how it violates the the stability criterion. Looking at the Python example, the check there could be better too, as it assumes that you know that the third name (dan) is the firsts partner. I'll fix it later. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:::Hi Paddy, OK, I see. Half of the message is missing (though the code itself states it fully in the 'and' expression and the comments). Thanks! --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
| |||