Anonymous user
Category talk:Unicon: Difference between revisions
→Works With
(→Works With: note on coalesce) |
|||
Line 142:
The needs improvement tag can be used to mark possible improvements and give a reason.
<pre><nowiki>{{improve|Unicon|The example is correct; however, Unicon implemented additional graphical features and a better example may be possible.}}</nowiki></pre>
==== Works With (DO NOT USE) ====
The works with macro provides standard text. '''Beyond that I'm not sure what advantage it has with regard to indexes or special pages?'''
<pre><nowiki>{{works with|Unicon}}</nowiki></pre>
'''If you are cleaning up the Icon/Unicon headers, please don't remove the either and add a works with. Works with appears not to add the task to the language so the category pages will be wrong. As far as I can tell the correct way is to use Works with AND to use both headers in a single line.''' Thanks
The template suggests this may be incorrect usage, see [[Template:Works_with]]. Specifically it says "Do not use this template to merely indicate what language implementation you used, ''but only if the example relies on features only a particular implementation/variant has.''"
I really don't know what goes on behind the scene with this and unless I hear otherwise, I recommend not to use it.
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 15:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
=== Template for new tasks ===
| |||