Catalan numbers
This page uses content from Wikipedia. The original article was at Catalan numbers. The list of authors can be seen in the page history. As with Rosetta Code, the text of Wikipedia is available under the GNU FDL. (See links for details on variance) |
![Task](http://static.miraheze.org/rosettacodewiki/thumb/b/ba/Rcode-button-task-crushed.png/64px-Rcode-button-task-crushed.png)
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.
Catalan numbers are a sequence of numbers which can be defined directly:
Or recursively:
Or alternatively (also recursive):
Implement at least one of these algorithms and print out the first 15 Catalan numbers with each. Memoization is not required, but may be worth the effort when using the second method above.
Ada
<lang Ada> with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Test_Catalan is
function Catalan (N : Natural) return Natural is Result : Positive := 1; begin for I in 1..N loop Result := Result * 2 * (2 * I - 1) / (I + 1); end loop; return Result; end Catalan;
begin
for N in 0..15 loop Put_Line (Integer'Image (N) & " =" & Integer'Image (Catalan (N))); end loop;
end Test_Catalan; </lang> Sample output:
0 = 1 1 = 1 2 = 2 3 = 5 4 = 14 5 = 42 6 = 132 7 = 429 8 = 1430 9 = 4862 10 = 16796 11 = 58786 12 = 208012 13 = 742900 14 = 2674440 15 = 9694845
BASIC
Use of REDIM PRESERVE
means this will not work in QBasic (although that could be worked around if desired).
<lang qbasic>DECLARE FUNCTION catalan (n as INTEGER) AS SINGLE
REDIM SHARED results(0) AS SINGLE
FOR x% = 1 TO 15
PRINT x%, catalan (x%)
NEXT
FUNCTION catalan (n as INTEGER) AS SINGLE
IF UBOUND(results) < n THEN REDIM PRESERVE results(n)
IF 0 = n THEN results(0) = 1 ELSE results(n) = ((2 * ((2 * n) - 1)) / (n + 1)) * catalan(n - 1) END IF catalan = results(n)
END FUNCTION</lang>
Output:
1 1 2 2 3 5 4 14 5 42 6 132 7 429 8 1430 9 4862 10 16796 11 58786 12 208012 13 742900 14 2674440 15 9694845
Brat
<lang brat>catalan = { n |
true? n == 0 { 1 } { (2 * ( 2 * n - 1) / ( n + 1 )) * catalan(n - 1) }
}
0.to 15 { n |
p "#{n} - #{catalan n}"
}</lang> Output:
0 - 1 1 - 1 2 - 2 3 - 5 4 - 14 5 - 42 6 - 132 7 - 429 8 - 1430 9 - 4862 10 - 16796 11 - 58786 12 - 208012 13 - 742900 14 - 2674440 15 - 9694845
C#
<lang csharp> namespace CatalanNumbers {
/// <summary> /// Class that holds all options. /// </summary> public class CatalanNumberGenerator { private static double Factorial(double n) { if (n == 0) return 1;
return n * Factorial(n - 1); }
public double FirstOption(double n) { const double topMultiplier = 2; return Factorial(topMultiplier * n) / (Factorial(n + 1) * Factorial(n)); }
public double SecondOption(double n) { if (n == 0) { return 1; } double sum = 0; double i = 0; for (; i <= (n - 1); i++) { sum += SecondOption(i) * SecondOption((n - 1) - i); } return sum; }
public double ThirdOption(double n) { if (n == 0) { return 1; } return ((2 * (2 * n - 1)) / (n + 1)) * ThirdOption(n - 1); } }
}
// Program.cs
using System;
using System.Configuration;
// Main program // Be sure to add the following to the App.config file and add a reference to System.Configuration: // <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> // <configuration> // <appSettings> // <clear/> // <add key="MaxCatalanNumber" value="50"/> // </appSettings> // </configuration> namespace CatalanNumbers {
class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { CatalanNumberGenerator generator = new CatalanNumberGenerator(); int i = 0; DateTime initial; DateTime final; TimeSpan ts;
try { initial = DateTime.Now; for (; i <= Convert.ToInt32(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MaxCatalanNumber"]); i++) { Console.WriteLine("CatalanNumber({0}):{1}", i, generator.FirstOption(i)); } final = DateTime.Now; ts = final - initial; Console.WriteLine("It took {0}.{1} to execute\n", ts.Seconds, ts.Milliseconds);
i = 0; initial = DateTime.Now; for (; i <= Convert.ToInt32(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MaxCatalanNumber"]); i++) { Console.WriteLine("CatalanNumber({0}):{1}", i, generator.SecondOption(i)); } final = DateTime.Now; ts = final - initial; Console.WriteLine("It took {0}.{1} to execute\n", ts.Seconds, ts.Milliseconds);
i = 0; initial = DateTime.Now; for (; i <= Convert.ToInt32(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["MaxCatalanNumber"]); i++) { Console.WriteLine("CatalanNumber({0}):{1}", i, generator.ThirdOption(i)); } final = DateTime.Now; ts = final - initial; Console.WriteLine("It took {0}.{1} to execute", ts.Seconds, ts.Milliseconds, ts.TotalMilliseconds); Console.ReadLine(); } catch (Exception ex) { Console.WriteLine("Stopped at index {0}:", i); Console.WriteLine(ex.Message); Console.ReadLine(); } } }
} </lang> Output:
CatalanNumber(0):1 CatalanNumber(1):1 CatalanNumber(2):2 CatalanNumber(3):5 CatalanNumber(4):14 CatalanNumber(5):42 CatalanNumber(6):132 CatalanNumber(7):429 CatalanNumber(8):1430 CatalanNumber(9):4862 CatalanNumber(10):16796 CatalanNumber(11):58786 CatalanNumber(12):208012 CatalanNumber(13):742900 CatalanNumber(14):2674440 CatalanNumber(15):9694845 It took 0.14 to execute CatalanNumber(0):1 CatalanNumber(1):1 CatalanNumber(2):2 CatalanNumber(3):5 CatalanNumber(4):14 CatalanNumber(5):42 CatalanNumber(6):132 CatalanNumber(7):429 CatalanNumber(8):1430 CatalanNumber(9):4862 CatalanNumber(10):16796 CatalanNumber(11):58786 CatalanNumber(12):208012 CatalanNumber(13):742900 CatalanNumber(14):2674440 CatalanNumber(15):9694845 It took 0.922 to execute CatalanNumber(0):1 CatalanNumber(1):1 CatalanNumber(2):2 CatalanNumber(3):5 CatalanNumber(4):14 CatalanNumber(5):42 CatalanNumber(6):132 CatalanNumber(7):429 CatalanNumber(8):1430 CatalanNumber(9):4862 CatalanNumber(10):16796 CatalanNumber(11):58786 CatalanNumber(12):208012 CatalanNumber(13):742900 CatalanNumber(14):2674440 CatalanNumber(15):9694845 It took 0.3 to execute
C
We declare 4 functions representing the four different algorithms for calculating Catalan numbers as given in the description of the task. (algorithms.h) <lang c>#if !defined __ALGORITHMS_H__
- define __ALGORITHMS_H__
unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersDirectFactorial(unsigned n); unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient(unsigned n); unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveSum(unsigned n); unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction(unsigned n);
- endif //!defined __ALGORITHMS_H__</lang>
Here is the implementation of the algorithms. In addition, we define two supporting functions for the calculation of factorials and binomial coefficients. Because these two are only internal supporting code they are not declared in algorithm.h and thus are hidden from the outside world. (algorithms.c) <lang c>#include <math.h>
- include "algorithms.h"
unsigned long long calculateBinomialCoefficient(unsigned n, unsigned k); unsigned long long calculateFactorial(unsigned n);
unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersDirectFactorial(unsigned n)
{ if(n>1) { unsigned long long nFac = calculateFactorial(n); return calculateFactorial(2 * n) / ((n + 1) * nFac * nFac); } else { return 1; } }
unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient(unsigned n)
{ if(n>1) return 1.0 / (n + 1) * calculateBinomialCoefficient(2 * n, n); else return 1; }
unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveSum(unsigned n)
{ if(n>1) { const unsigned n_ = n - 1; unsigned long long sum = 0; unsigned i; for(i = 0; i <= n_; i++) sum += calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveSum(i) * calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveSum(n_ - i); return sum; } else { return 1; } }
unsigned long long calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction(unsigned n)
{ if(n>1) return (double)(2 * (2 * n - 1)) / (n + 1) * calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction(n-1); else return 1; }
unsigned long long calculateFactorial(unsigned n)
{ if(n>1) return n * calculateFactorial(n-1); else return 1; }
unsigned long long calculateBinomialCoefficient(unsigned n, unsigned k)
{ double product = 1; unsigned i;
if(k == 0) return 1; if(n == 0) return 0; for(i = 1; i <= k; i++) product *= ((double)(n - (k - i)) / i); return (unsigned long long)floor(product + 0.5); }</lang>
In order to test what we have done, a test function is declared. Usage of a function pointer parameter (note how the typedef simplifies the subsequent code) allows it to execute any or our algorithms. (tester.h) <lang c>#if !defined __TESTER_H__
- define __TESTER_H__
typedef unsigned long long (*Algorithm)(unsigned); void test(Algorithm, unsigned N, char* title);
- endif //!defined __TESTER_H__</lang>
Here is the implementation of our test function. (tester.c) <lang c>#include <stdio.h>
- include <string.h>
- include "tester.h"
void test(Algorithm algorithm, unsigned N, char* title)
{ unsigned i;
if(title != NULL && strlen(title) > 1) printf("%s\n", title); for(i = 0; i <= N; i++) printf("C(%u)\t= %u\n", i, algorithm(i)); printf("\n"); }</lang>
Finally, we test the four different algorithms. Note that the first one (direct calculation using the factorial) only works up to N = 10 because some intermediate result (namely (2n)! with n = 11) exceeds the boundaries of an unsigned 64 bit integer. (catalanNumbersTest.c) <lang c>#include "tester.h"
- include "algorithms.h"
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{ test(calculateCatalanNumbersDirectFactorial, 10, "Direct calculation using the factorial"); test(calculateCatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient, 15, "Direct calculation using a binomial coefficient"); test(calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveSum, 15, "Recursive calculation using a sum"); test(calculateCatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction, 15, "Recursive calculation using a fraction");
return 0; }</lang>
Output (source code is compiled both by MS Visual C++ 10.0 (WinXP 32 bit) and GNU g++ 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit) compilers):
Direct calculation using the factorial C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 Direct calculation using a binomial coefficient C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845 Recursive calculation using a sum C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845 Recursive calculation using a fraction C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845
C++
We declare 4 classes representing the four different algorithms for calculating Catalan numbers as given in the description of the task. In addition, we declare two supporting classes for the calculation of factorials and binomial coefficients. Because these two are only internal supporting code they are hidden in namespace 'detail'. Overloading the function call operator to execute the calculation is an obvious decision when using C++. (algorithms.h) <lang cpp>#if !defined __ALGORITHMS_H__
- define __ALGORITHMS_H__
namespace rosetta
{ namespace catalanNumbers { namespace detail {
class Factorial { public: unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n)const; };
class BinomialCoefficient { public: unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n, unsigned k)const; };
} //namespace detail
class CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial { public: CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial(); unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n)const; private: detail::Factorial factorial; };
class CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient { public: CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient(); unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n)const; private: detail::BinomialCoefficient binomialCoefficient; };
class CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum { public: CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum(); unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n)const; };
class CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction { public: CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction(); unsigned long long operator()(unsigned n)const; };
} //namespace catalanNumbers } //namespace rosetta
- endif //!defined __ALGORITHMS_H__</lang>
Here is the implementation of the algorithms. The c'tor of each class tells us the algorithm which will be used. (algorithms.cpp) <lang cpp>#include <iostream> using std::cout; using std::endl;
- include <cmath>
using std::floor;
- include "algorithms.h"
using namespace rosetta::catalanNumbers;
CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial::CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial()
{ cout<<"Direct calculation using the factorial"<<endl; }
unsigned long long CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial::operator()(unsigned n)const
{ if(n>1) { unsigned long long nFac = factorial(n); return factorial(2 * n) / ((n + 1) * nFac * nFac); } else { return 1; } }
CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient::CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient()
{ cout<<"Direct calculation using a binomial coefficient"<<endl; }
unsigned long long CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient::operator()(unsigned n)const
{ if(n>1) return double(1) / (n + 1) * binomialCoefficient(2 * n, n); else return 1; }
CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum::CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum()
{ cout<<"Recursive calculation using a sum"<<endl; }
unsigned long long CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum::operator()(unsigned n)const
{ if(n>1) { const unsigned n_ = n - 1; unsigned long long sum = 0; for(unsigned i = 0; i <= n_; i++) sum += operator()(i) * operator()(n_ - i); return sum; } else { return 1; } }
CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction::CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction()
{ cout<<"Recursive calculation using a fraction"<<endl; }
unsigned long long CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction::operator()(unsigned n)const
{ if(n>1) return (double(2 * (2 * n - 1)) / (n + 1)) * operator()(n-1); else return 1; }
unsigned long long detail::Factorial::operator()(unsigned n)const
{ if(n>1) return n * operator()(n-1); else return 1; }
unsigned long long detail::BinomialCoefficient::operator()(unsigned n, unsigned k)const
{ if(k == 0) return 1; if(n == 0) return 0;
double product = 1; for(unsigned i = 1; i <= k; i++) product *= (double(n - (k - i)) / i); return (unsigned long long)(floor(product + 0.5)); }</lang>
In order to test what we have done, a class Test is created. Using the template parameters N (number of Catalan numbers to be calculated) and A (the kind of algorithm to be used) the compiler will create code for all the test cases we need. What would C++ be without templates ;-) (tester.h) <lang cpp>#if !defined __TESTER_H__
- define __TESTER_H__
- include <iostream>
namespace rosetta
{ namespace catalanNumbers {
template <int N, typename A> class Test { public: static void Do() { A algorithm; for(int i = 0; i <= N; i++) std::cout<<"C("<<i<<")\t= "<<algorithm(i)<<std::endl; } };
} //namespace catalanNumbers } //namespace rosetta
- endif //!defined __TESTER_H__</lang>
Finally, we test the four different algorithms. Note that the first one (direct calculation using the factorial) only works up to N = 10 because some intermediate result (namely (2n)! with n = 11) exceeds the boundaries of an unsigned 64 bit integer. (catalanNumbersTest.cpp) <lang cpp>#include "algorithms.h"
- include "tester.h"
using namespace rosetta::catalanNumbers;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{ Test<10, CatalanNumbersDirectFactorial>::Do(); Test<15, CatalanNumbersDirectBinomialCoefficient>::Do(); Test<15, CatalanNumbersRecursiveFraction>::Do(); Test<15, CatalanNumbersRecursiveSum>::Do(); return 0; }</lang>
Output (source code is compiled both by MS Visual C++ 10.0 (WinXP 32 bit) and GNU g++ 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit) compilers):
Direct calculation using the factorial C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 Direct calculation using a binomial coefficient C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 428 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845 Recursive calculation using a fraction C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845 Recursive calculation using a sum C(0) = 1 C(1) = 1 C(2) = 2 C(3) = 5 C(4) = 14 C(5) = 42 C(6) = 132 C(7) = 429 C(8) = 1430 C(9) = 4862 C(10) = 16796 C(11) = 58786 C(12) = 208012 C(13) = 742900 C(14) = 2674440 C(15) = 9694845
Clojure
<lang Clojure>(def ! (memoize #(apply * (range 1 (inc %)))))
(defn catalan-numbers-direct []
(map #(/ (! (* 2 %))
(* (! (inc %)) (! %))) (range)))
(def catalan-numbers-recursive
#(->> [1 1] ; [c0 n1]
(iterate (fn c n [(* 2 (dec (* 2 n)) (/ (inc n)) c) (inc n)]) ,) (map first ,)))
user> (take 15 (catalan-numbers-direct)) (1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440)
user> (take 15 (catalan-numbers-recursive)) (1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440)</lang>
Common Lisp
With all three methods defined. <lang lisp>(defun catalan1 (n)
;; factorial. CLISP actually has "!" defined for this (labels ((! (x) (if (zerop x) 1 (* x (! (1- x)))))) (/ (! (* 2 n)) (! (1+ n)) (! n))))
- cache
(defparameter *catalans* (make-array 5 :fill-pointer 0 :adjustable t :element-type 'integer)) (defun catalan2 (n)
(if (zerop n) 1 ;; check cache (if (< n (length *catalans*)) (aref *catalans* n) (loop with c = 0 for i from 0 to (1- n) collect
(incf c (* (catalan2 i) (catalan2 (- n 1 i)))) ;; lower values always get calculated first, so ;; vector-push-extend is safe finally (progn (vector-push-extend c *catalans*) (return c))))))
(defun catalan3 (n)
(if (zerop n) 1 (/ (* 2 (+ n n -1) (catalan3 (1- n))) (1+ n))))
- test all three methods
(loop for f in (list #'catalan1 #'catalan2 #'catalan3)
for i from 1 to 3 do (format t "~%Method ~d:~%" i) (dotimes (i 16) (format t "C(~2d) = ~d~%" i (catalan2 i))))</lang>
D
<lang d>import std.stdio, std.bigint, std.functional;
BigInt factorial(uint n) {
alias memoize!factorial mfact; return n ? mfact(n - 1) * n : BigInt(1);
}
auto cats1(uint n) {
return factorial(2 * n) / (factorial(n + 1) * factorial(n));
}
BigInt cats2(uint n) {
alias memoize!cats2 mcats2; if (n == 0) return BigInt(1); auto sum = BigInt(0); foreach (i; 0 .. n) sum += mcats2(i) * mcats2(n - 1 - i); return sum;
}
BigInt cats3(uint n) {
alias memoize!cats3 mcats3; return n ? (4*n - 2) * mcats3(n - 1) / (n + 1) : BigInt(1);
}
void main() {
foreach (i; 0 .. 15) writefln("%2d => %s %s %s", i, cats1(i), cats2(i), cats3(i));
}</lang> Output:
0 => 1 1 1 1 => 1 1 1 2 => 2 2 2 3 => 5 5 5 4 => 14 14 14 5 => 42 42 42 6 => 132 132 132 7 => 429 429 429 8 => 1430 1430 1430 9 => 4862 4862 4862 10 => 16796 16796 16796 11 => 58786 58786 58786 12 => 208012 208012 208012 13 => 742900 742900 742900 14 => 2674440 2674440 2674440
Fantom
<lang fantom> class Main {
static Int factorial (Int n) { Int res := 1 if (n>1) (2..n).each |i| { res *= i } return res }
static Int catalanA (Int n) { return factorial(2*n)/(factorial(n+1) * factorial(n)) }
static Int catalanB (Int n) { if (n == 0) { return 1 } else { sum := 0 n.times |i| { sum += catalanB(i) * catalanB(n-1-i) } return sum } }
static Int catalanC (Int n) { if (n == 0) { return 1 } else { return catalanC(n-1)*2*(2*n-1)/(n+1) } }
public static Void main () { (1..15).each |n| { echo (n.toStr.padl(4) + catalanA(n).toStr.padl(10) + catalanB(n).toStr.padl(10) + catalanC(n).toStr.padl(10)) } }
} </lang>
22! exceeds the range of Fantom's Int class, so the first technique fails afer n=10
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 5 5 4 14 14 14 5 42 42 42 6 132 132 132 7 429 429 429 8 1430 1430 1430 9 4862 4862 4862 10 16796 16796 16796 11 -65 58786 58786 12 -2 208012 208012 13 0 742900 742900 14 97 2674440 2674440 15 -2 9694845 9694845
Forth
<lang forth>: catalan ( n -- ) 1 swap 1+ 1 do dup cr . i 2* 1- 2* i 1+ */ loop drop ;</lang>
Fortran
<lang fortran> program main
!======================================================================================= implicit none
!=== Local data integer :: n
!=== External procedures double precision, external :: catalan_numbers !=== Execution =========================================================================
write(*,'(1x,a)')'===============' write(*,'(5x,a,6x,a)')'n','c(n)' write(*,'(1x,a)')'---------------'
do n = 0, 14 write(*,'(1x,i5,i10)') n, int(catalan_numbers(n)) enddo
write(*,'(1x,a)')'==============='
!=======================================================================================
end program main !BL !BL !BL double precision recursive function catalan_numbers(n) result(value)
!======================================================================================= implicit none
!=== Input, ouput data integer, intent(in) :: n
!=== Execution =========================================================================
if ( n .eq. 0 ) then value = 1 else value = ( 2.0d0 * dfloat(2 * n - 1) / dfloat( n + 1 ) ) * catalan_numbers(n-1) endif
!=======================================================================================
end function catalan_numbers </lang>
Output
=============== n c(n) --------------- 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 5 4 14 5 42 6 132 7 429 8 1430 9 4862 10 16796 11 58786 12 208012 13 742900 14 2674440 ===============
Frink
Frink includes efficient algorithms for calculating arbitrarily-large binomial coefficients and automatically caches factorials. <lang frink> catalan[n] := binomial[2n,n]/(n+1) for n = 0 to 15
println[catalan[n]]
</lang>
GAP
<lang gap>Catalan1 := function(n) return Binomial(2*n, n) - Binomial(2*n, n - 1); end;
Catalan2 := function(n) return Binomial(2*n, n)/(n + 1); end;
Catalan3 := function(n) local k, c; c := 1; k := 0; while k < n do k := k + 1; c := 2*(2*k-1)*c/(k + 1); od; return c; end;
Catalan4_memo := [1]; Catalan4 := function(n) if not IsBound(Catalan4_memo[n + 1]) then Catalan4_memo[n + 1] := Sum([0 .. n - 1], i -> Catalan4(i)*Catalan4(n - 1 - i)); fi; return Catalan4_memo[n + 1]; end;
- The first fifteen: 0 to 14 !
List([0 .. 14], n -> Catalan1(n)); List([0 .. 14], n -> Catalan2(n)); List([0 .. 14], n -> Catalan3(n)); List([0 .. 14], n -> Catalan4(n));
- Same output for all four:
- [ 1, 1, 2, 5, 14, 42, 132, 429, 1430, 4862, 16796, 58786, 208012, 742900, 2674440 ]</lang>
Go
Direct: <lang go>package main
import (
"big" "fmt"
)
func main() {
var b, c big.Int for n := int64(0); n < 15; n++ { fmt.Println(c.Div(b.Binomial(n*2, n), c.SetInt64(n+1))) }
}</lang> Output:
1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440
Haskell
<lang haskell>-- Three infinite lists, corresponding to the three definitions in the problem -- statement.
cats1 = map (\n -> product [n+2..2*n] `div` product [1..n]) [0..]
cats2 = 1 : map (\n -> sum $ zipWith (*) (reverse (take n cats2)) cats2) [1..]
cats3 = 1 : zipWith (\c n -> c*2*(2*n-1) `div` (n+1)) cats3 [1..]
main = mapM_ (print . take 15) [cats1, cats2, cats3]</lang> Output:
[1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,4862,16796,58786,208012,742900,2674440] [1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,4862,16796,58786,208012,742900,2674440] [1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430,4862,16796,58786,208012,742900,2674440]
Icon and Unicon
<lang Icon>procedure main(arglist) every writes(catalan(i)," ") end
procedure catalan(n) # return catalan(n) or fail static M initial M := table()
if n > 0 then
return (n = 1) | \M[n] | ( M[n] := (2*(2*n-1)*catalan(n-1))/(n+1))
end</lang>
Output:
1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440 9694845
J
<lang j> ((! +:) % >:) i.15x 1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440</lang>
JavaScript
<lang javascript><html><head><title>Catalan</title></head>
<body>
<script type="application/javascript">
function disp(x) { var e = document.createTextNode(x + '\n'); document.getElementById('x').appendChild(e); }
var fc = [], c2 = [], c3 = []; function fact(n) { return fc[n] ? fc[n] : fc[n] = (n ? n * fact(n - 1) : 1); } function cata1(n) { return Math.floor(fact(2 * n) / fact(n + 1) / fact(n) + .5); } function cata2(n) { if (n == 0) return 1; if (!c2[n]) { var s = 0; for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) s += cata2(i) * cata2(n - i - 1); c2[n] = s; } return c2[n]; } function cata3(n) { if (n == 0) return 1; return c3[n] ? c3[n] : c3[n] = (4 * n - 2) * cata3(n - 1) / (n + 1); }
disp(" meth1 meth2 meth3"); for (var i = 0; i <= 15; i++) disp(i + '\t' + cata1(i) + '\t' + cata2(i) + '\t' + cata3(i));
</script></body></html></lang>output<lang> meth1 meth2 meth3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 5 5 4 14 14 14 5 42 42 42 6 132 132 132 7 429 429 429 8 1430 1430 1430 9 4862 4862 4862 10 16796 16796 16796 11 58786 58786 58786 12 208012 208012 208012 13 742900 742900 742900 14 2674440 2674440 2674440 15 9694845 9694845 9694845</lang>
Java
Accuracy may be lost for larger n's due to floating-point arithmetic (seen for C(15) here). This implementation is memoized (factorial and Catalan numbers are stored in the Maps "facts", "catsI", "catsR1", and "catsR2"). <lang java5>import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.Map;
public class Catalan { private static final Map<Long, Double> facts = new HashMap<Long, Double>(); private static final Map<Long, Double> catsI = new HashMap<Long, Double>(); private static final Map<Long, Double> catsR1 = new HashMap<Long, Double>(); private static final Map<Long, Double> catsR2 = new HashMap<Long, Double>();
static{//pre-load the memoization maps with some answers facts.put(0L, 1D); facts.put(1L, 1D); facts.put(2L, 2D);
catsI.put(0L, 1D); catsR1.put(0L, 1D); catsR2.put(0L, 1D); }
private static double fact(long n){ if(facts.containsKey(n)){ return facts.get(n); } double fact = 1; for(long i = 2; i <= n; i++){ fact *= i; //could be further optimized, but it would probably be ugly } facts.put(n, fact); return fact; }
private static double catI(long n){ if(!catsI.containsKey(n)){ catsI.put(n, fact(2 * n)/(fact(n+1)*fact(n))); } return catsI.get(n); }
private static double catR1(long n){ if(catsR1.containsKey(n)){ return catsR1.get(n); } double sum = 0; for(int i = 0; i < n; i++){ sum += catR1(i) * catR1(n - 1 - i); } catsR1.put(n, sum); return sum; }
private static double catR2(long n){ if(!catsR2.containsKey(n)){ catsR2.put(n, ((2.0*(2*(n-1) + 1))/(n + 1)) * catR2(n-1)); } return catsR2.get(n); }
public static void main(String[] args){ for(int i = 0; i <= 15; i++){ System.out.println(catI(i)); System.out.println(catR1(i)); System.out.println(catR2(i)); } } } </lang> Output:
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 132.0 132.0 132.0 429.0 429.0 429.0 1430.0 1430.0 1430.0 4862.0 4862.0 4862.0 16796.0 16796.0 16796.0 58786.0 58786.0 58786.0 208012.0 208012.0 208012.0 742900.0 742900.0 742900.0 2674439.9999999995 2674440.0 2674440.0 9694844.999999998 9694845.0 9694845.0
K
<lang k> catalan: {_{*/(x-i)%1+i:!y-1}[2*x;x+1]%x+1}
catalan'!:15
1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440</lang>
Mathematica
<lang Mathematica>CatalanN[n_Integer /; n >= 0] := (2 n)!/((n + 1)! n!)</lang> Sample Output: <lang Mathematica> TableForm[CatalanN/@Range[0,15]] //TableForm= 1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440 9694845 </lang>
MATLAB
<lang MATLAB>function n = catalanNumbers(n)
for i = (1:length(n)) n(i) = (1/(n(i)+1))*nchoosek(2*n(i),n(i)); end
end</lang> Sample Output: <lang MATLAB>>> catalanNumbers(14)
ans =
2674440
>> catalanNumbers((0:17))'
ans =
1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440 9694845 35357670 129644790</lang>
PARI/GP
Memoization is not worthwhile; PARI has fast built-in facilities for calculating binomial coefficients and factorials. <lang parigp>Catalan(n)=binomial(2*n,n+1)/n</lang>
A second version: <lang parigp>Catalan(n)=(2*n)!/(n+1)!/n!</lang>
Naive version: <lang parigp>Catalan(n)=prod(k=n+2,2*n,k)/prod(k=2,n,k)</lang>
The first version takes about 1.5 seconds to compute the millionth Catalan number, while the second takes 3.9 seconds. The naive implementation, for comparison, takes 21 minutes (850 times longer). In any case, printing the first 15 is simple: <lang parigp>vector(15,n,Catalan(n))</lang>
Perl
<lang perl>sub f { $_[0] ? $_[0] * f($_[0]-1) : 1 } sub catalan { f(2 * $_[0]) / f($_[0]) / f($_[0]+1) }
print "$_\t@{[ catalan($_) ]}\n" for 0 .. 20;</lang>
For computing up to 20 ish, memoization is not needed. For much bigger numbers, this is faster: <lang perl>my @c = (1); sub catalan {
use bigint; $c[$_[0]] //= catalan($_[0]-1) * (4 * $_[0]-2) / ($_[0]+1)
}
- most of the time is spent displaying the long numbers, actually
print "$_\t", catalan($_), "\n" for 0 .. 10000;</lang>
Perl 6
<lang perl6>my @catalan := 1, gather for 0..* -> $n {
take (4*$n + 2) / ($n + 2) * @catalan[$n];
}
.say for @catalan[^15];</lang>
Output:
1 1 2 5 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440
PHP
<lang php> <?php
class CatalanNumbersSerie {
private static $cache = array(0 => 1); private function fill_cache($i) { $accum = 0; $n = $i-1; for($k = 0; $k <= $n; $k++) { $accum += $this->item($k)*$this->item($n-$k); } self::$cache[$i] = $accum; } function item($i) { if (!isset(self::$cache[$i])) { $this->fill_cache($i); } return self::$cache[$i]; }
}
$cn = new CatalanNumbersSerie(); for($i = 0; $i <= 15;$i++) {
$r = $cn->item($i); echo "$i = $r\r\n";
} ?> </lang>
Output:
0 = 1 1 = 1 2 = 2 3 = 5 4 = 14 5 = 42 6 = 132 7 = 429 8 = 1430 9 = 4862 10 = 16796 11 = 58786 12 = 208012 13 = 742900 14 = 2674440 15 = 9694845
PicoLisp
<lang PicoLisp># Factorial (de fact (N)
(if (=0 N) 1 (* N (fact (dec N))) ) )
- Directly
(de catalanDir (N)
(/ (fact (* 2 N)) (fact (inc N)) (fact N)) )
- Recursively
(de catalanRec (N)
(if (=0 N) 1 (cache '(NIL) (pack (char (hash N)) N) # Memoize (sum '((I) (* (catalanRec I) (catalanRec (- N I 1)))) (range 0 (dec N)) ) ) ) )
- Alternatively
(de catalanAlt (N)
(if (=0 N) 1 (*/ 2 (dec (* 2 N)) (catalanAlt (dec N)) (inc N)) ) )
- Test
(for (N 0 (> 15 N) (inc N))
(tab (2 4 8 8 8) N " => " (catalanDir N) (catalanRec N) (catalanAlt N) ) )</lang>
Output:
0 => 1 1 1 1 => 1 1 1 2 => 2 2 2 3 => 5 5 5 4 => 14 14 14 5 => 42 42 42 6 => 132 132 132 7 => 429 429 429 8 => 1430 1430 1430 9 => 4862 4862 4862 10 => 16796 16796 16796 11 => 58786 58786 58786 12 => 208012 208012 208012 13 => 742900 742900 742900 14 => 2674440 2674440 2674440
Prolog
<lang Prolog>catalan(N) :- length(L1, N), L = [1 | L1], init(1,1,L1), numlist(0, N, NL), maplist(my_write, NL, L).
init(_, _, []).
init(V, N, [H | T]) :- N1 is N+1, H is 2 * (2 * N - 1) * V / N1, init(H, N1, T).
my_write(N, V) :- format('~w : ~w~n', [N, V]). </lang> Output :
?- catalan(15). 0 : 1 1 : 1 2 : 2 3 : 5 4 : 14 5 : 42 6 : 132 7 : 429 8 : 1430 9 : 4862 10 : 16796 11 : 58786 12 : 208012 13 : 742900 14 : 2674440 15 : 9694845 true .
Python
Three algorithms including explicit memoization. (Pythons factorial built-in function is not memoized internally).
Python will transparently switch to bignum-type integer arithmetic, so the code below works unchanged on computing larger catalan numbers such as cat(50) and beyond. <lang python>from math import factorial import functools
def memoize(func):
func.__cache = {} def memoized(key): # Returned, new, memoized version of decorated function cache = func.__cache if key in cache: return cache[key] else: cache[key] = result = func(key) return result return functools.update_wrapper(memoized, func)
@memoize
def fact(n):
return factorial(n)
def cat_direct(n):
return fact(2*n) // fact(n + 1) // fact(n)
@memoize def catR1(n):
return ( 1 if n == 0 else sum( catR1(i) * catR1(n - 1 - i) for i in range(n) ) )
@memoize def catR2(n):
return ( 1 if n == 0 else ( ( 4 * n - 2 ) * catR2( n - 1) ) // ( n + 1 ) )
if __name__ == '__main__':
def pr(results): fmt = '%-10s %-10s %-10s' print ((fmt % tuple(c.__name__ for c in defs)).upper()) print (fmt % tuple(['='*10]*3)) for r in zip(*results): print (fmt % r)
defs = (cat_direct, catR1, catR2) results = [ tuple(c(i) for i in range(15)) for c in defs ] pr(results)</lang>
Sample Output
CAT_DIRECT CATR1 CATR2 ========== ========== ========== 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 14 14 14 42 42 42 132 132 132 429 429 429 1430 1430 1430 4862 4862 4862 16796 16796 16796 58786 58786 58786 208012 208012 208012 742900 742900 742900 2674440 2674440 2674440
Ruby
Using a memoization module found at the Ruby Application Archive.
<lang ruby># direct
def factorial(n)
(1..n).reduce(1, :*)
end
def catalan_direct(n)
factorial(2*n) / (factorial(n+1) * factorial(n))
end
- recursive
def catalan_rec1(n)
return 1 if n == 0 (0..n-1).inject(0) {|sum, i| sum + catalan_rec1(i) * catalan_rec1(n-1-i)}
end
def catalan_rec2(n)
return 1 if n == 0 2*(2*n - 1) * catalan_rec2(n-1) /(n+1)
end
- performance and results
require 'benchmark' require 'memoize' include Memoize
Benchmark.bm(10) do |b|
b.report('forget') { 16.times {|n| [n, catalan_direct(n), catalan_rec1(n), catalan_rec2(n)]} } b.report('memoized') { memoize :factorial memoize :catalan_direct memoize :catalan_rec1 memoize :catalan_rec2 16.times {|n| [n, catalan_direct(n), catalan_rec1(n), catalan_rec2(n)]} }
end
16.times {|n| p [n, catalan_direct(n), catalan_rec1(n), catalan_rec2(n)]}</lang>
The output shows the dramatic difference memoizing makes.
user system total real forget 11.578000 0.000000 11.578000 ( 11.687000) memoized 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 ( 0.000000) [0, 1, 1, 1] [1, 1, 1, 1] [2, 2, 2, 2] [3, 5, 5, 5] [4, 14, 14, 14] [5, 42, 42, 42] [6, 132, 132, 132] [7, 429, 429, 429] [8, 1430, 1430, 1430] [9, 4862, 4862, 4862] [10, 16796, 16796, 16796] [11, 58786, 58786, 58786] [12, 208012, 208012, 208012] [13, 742900, 742900, 742900] [14, 2674440, 2674440, 2674440] [15, 9694845, 9694845, 9694845]
Scheme
Tail recursive implementation. <lang scheme>(define (catalan m)
(let loop ((c 1)(n 0)) (if (not (eqv? n m)) (begin (display n)(display ": ")(display c)(newline) (loop (* (/ (* 2 (- (* 2 (+ n 1)) 1)) (+ (+ n 1) 1)) c) (+ n 1) )))))
(catalan 15) </lang>
Output:
0: 1 1: 1 2: 2 3: 5 4: 14 5: 42 6: 132 7: 429 8: 1430 9: 4862 10: 16796 11: 58786 12: 208012 13: 742900 14: 2674440
Standard ML
<lang Standard ML> (*
* val catalan : int -> int * Returns the nth Catalan number. *)
fun catalan 0 = 1 | catalan n = ((4 * n - 2) * catalan(n - 1)) div (n + 1);
(*
* val print_catalans : int -> unit * Prints out Catalan numbers 0 through 15. *)
fun print_catalans(n) =
if n > 15 then () else (print (Int.toString(catalan n) ^ "\n"); print_catalans(n + 1)); print_catalans(0);
(*
* 1 * 1 * 2 * 5 * 14 * 42 * 132 * 429 * 1430 * 4862 * 16796 * 58786 * 208012 * 742900 * 2674440 * 9694845 *)
</lang>
Tcl
<lang tcl>package require Tcl 8.5
- Memoization wrapper
proc memoize {function value generator} {
variable memoize set key $function,$value if {![info exists memoize($key)]} {
set memoize($key) [uplevel 1 $generator]
} return $memoize($key)
}
- The simplest recursive definition
proc tcl::mathfunc::catalan n {
if {[incr n 0] < 0} {error "must not be negative"} memoize catalan $n {expr {
$n == 0 ? 1 : 2 * (2*$n - 1) * catalan($n - 1) / ($n + 1)
}}
}</lang> Demonstration: <lang tcl>for {set i 0} {$i < 15} {incr i} {
puts "C_$i = [expr {catalan($i)}]"
}</lang> Output:
C_0 = 1 C_1 = 1 C_2 = 2 C_3 = 5 C_4 = 14 C_5 = 42 C_6 = 132 C_7 = 429 C_8 = 1430 C_9 = 4862 C_10 = 16796 C_11 = 58786 C_12 = 208012 C_13 = 742900 C_14 = 2674440
Of course, this code also works unchanged (apart from extending the loop) for producing higher Catalan numbers. For example, here is the end of the output when asked to produce the first fifty:
C_45 = 2257117854077248073253720 C_46 = 8740328711533173390046320 C_47 = 33868773757191046886429490 C_48 = 131327898242169365477991900 C_49 = 509552245179617138054608572
TI-83 BASIC
This problem is perfectly suited for a TI calculator. <lang TI-83 BASIC>:For(I,1,15
- Disp (2I)!/((I+1)!I!
- End</lang>Output:
1 2 4 14 42 132 429 1430 4862 16796 58786 208012 742900 2674440 9694845 Done
Ursala
<lang ursala>#import std
- import nat
catalan = quotient^\successor choose^/double ~&
- cast %nL
t = catalan* iota 16</lang> output:
< 1, 1, 2, 5, 14, 42, 132, 429, 1430, 4862, 16796, 58786, 208012, 742900, 2674440, 9694845>
VBA
<lang vb> Public Sub Catalan1(n As Integer) 'Computes the first n Catalan numbers according to the first recursion given Dim Cat() As Long Dim sum As Long
ReDim Cat(n) Cat(0) = 1 For i = 0 To n - 1
sum = 0 For j = 0 To i sum = sum + Cat(j) * Cat(i - j) Next j Cat(i + 1) = sum
Next i Debug.Print For i = 0 To n
Debug.Print i, Cat(i)
Next End Sub
Public Sub Catalan2(n As Integer) 'Computes the first n Catalan numbers according to the second recursion given Dim Cat() As Long
ReDim Cat(n) Cat(0) = 1 For i = 1 To n
Cat(i) = 2 * Cat(i - 1) * (2 * i - 1) / (i + 1)
Next i Debug.Print For i = 0 To n
Debug.Print i, Cat(i)
Next End Sub </lang>
Result:
Catalan1 15 0 1 1 1 2 2 3 5 4 14 5 42 6 132 7 429 8 1430 9 4862 10 16796 11 58786 12 208012 13 742900 14 2674440 15 9694845
(Expect same result with "Catalan2 15")