Vera
Joined 24 August 2022
Content deleted Content added
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 43:
:Dear Mike - thanks for that 'official' welcome ''' :)''' . Getting to know the Wiki bit by bit I start realizing how much effort you (Kevin and ???) have to take to keep an eye on all the changes and care about big and small concerns - and how quickly you jump in to help. cheers --[[User:Vera|Vera]] 11:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
::Ech. There are so many people that put a lot of effort in, that I decided a long time ago it would be socially dangerous to try to list them all. There are a fair number, though. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
== Hallo :-) ==
Hallo Vera,
habe http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Monte_Carlo_methods#PureBasic hinzugefügt, bin aber noch nicht zufrieden damit, werde es noch mal überarbeiten.
Gibt es hier eine Möglichkeit zu verhindern das Zwei oder mehr Personen an der Gleichen Sache arbeiten?
Gruß --[[User:Christian|Christian]] 10:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
: Hi Christian, schön, dass Du auch gekommen bist :) .
: Da haben wir heut' gleich noch was zu feiern: 100 geschafft.
: Bei einem offenen Wiki, wie diesem hier, kann jeder jederzeit alles ändern oder Änderungen zurücknehmen (das Team passt aber gut auf). Bislang habe ich den Eindruck, dass die Lösungen anderer 'respektiert' oder 'nur' verbessert werden und man die Zeit hat, die eigenen Lösungswege nach und nach zu optimieren. Ob es eine Sicherung gibt, wenn tatsächlich zwei oder mehr Leute gleichzeitig genau die selbe Stelle bearbeiten vermute ich ja, ist mir jedoch noch nicht passiert. cheers - --[[User:Vera|Vera]] 13:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
:: 100?! das ging ganz schön flott! Zählst du das jedesmal durch, oder kann man das irgendwo auslesen?
:: Das mit dem ''gleichzeitig'' bezog sich nicht auf das Wiki, ich dachte an sowas wie http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_triangle/Puzzle
:: Angenommen ich entschließe mich am Sonntag morgen dazu es in PB zu schreiben, und weil ich jetzt noch keine Ahnung habe wie ich es lösen kann, könnte es ja sein, dass ich erst am Abend fertig bin. Da sollte es eine Stelle geben wo ich reinschreiben kann "ich bearbeite gerade...".--[[User:Christian|Christian]] 20:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
== PureBASIC ==
As Kevin surmised, I ran a spider when I logged in. It was an accident, reverted about 500 edits, and so I restored the database again this afternoon. Sunday's edits should be back. I can't do anything about edits that were made today. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 18:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
: Dear Michael - ''that must have been Boris'' [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP3PrZR8Lxw] ''' ;)''' - thanks for setting things right again and I hope you didn't have too much trouble moving to the new server and enjoy the proceeding growth of your fine project. --[[User:Vera|Vera]] 22:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Kevin,
''as todays post are gone I still like to say:''
* thanks for your response and explanations that relieved me (and at least three more people who got a bit worried too). I read it earlier but couldn't answer 'til now and now I find that everything seems to be put into place again. joyful regards ~ --[[User:Vera|Vera]] 23:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
== Concerning double headers ==
I received your message:
: ''Hello Demivec, looks like one cannot have twice the same header on one task-page, as the following entry in the row seems to be removed automatically. But if both solutions are valuable in itself, one could add a further one as alternativ way and point out the reason when it's of advantage. What do you think? --Vera 19:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)''
I can only guess at what you are referring to, but I think I'll guess right. I was editing the task page for 'Memory Allocation' and when I submitted my changes it became apparent that Marcos had also edited the page at the same time and had completed his revisions before I did. This left the task page with two 'PureBasic' headers. It took me a few tries to accomplish but I managed to delete my contribution and to edit his contribution to include portions of mine. If you are referring to something else please let me know. --[[User:Demivec|Demivec]] 21:17, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
: Yes you guessed right. We've been online at the same time, so I saw what happened and thought I'd reached you straight away. I wondered if you would have liked to include an alternative solution, that's why I asked. Fortunately Michael read it and suggested a way how this could be handled currently or for future cases - that's good to know. --[[User:Vera|Vera]] 09:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
| |||