User talk:PureFox: Difference between revisions
→Disagreement on 9 (and 7) digit palindromic products: Yep, they were wrong :(
(add comment) |
(→Disagreement on 9 (and 7) digit palindromic products: Yep, they were wrong :() |
||
Line 266:
: Go seems to be prioritizing keeping the multiplicand as high as possible, while not checking more balanced combinations. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 13:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
::Sorry, you're both right - the original Wren (and hence Go) solutions were wrong and it was just by good fortune that they were giving the right answers for N <= 6. However, I've corrected them and the results for N = 7, 8 and 9 now agree with the Raku solution. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 16:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
| |||