User talk:LordMike

From Rosetta Code


Welcome to Rosetta Code! I'm Mike, and I noticed you created an account.

Some quick things you should be aware of:

Template:Mylang Helps you show what languages you're familiar with, and helps us become aware of skills with languages we haven't seen.
Category:Unimplemented tasks by language A place to find tasks missing solutions in various languages.
Blogs, twitter, facebook... We have them, and are interested in yours.
Special:Webchat Logs you into #rosettacode on the Freenode IRC channel. Not usually the most active communications medium, but occasionally helpful. It's logged at
Rosetta Code:Village Pump A general Q/A and discussion area.
Rosetta Code:Finances For most of Rosetta Code's history, expenses have been paid out of my pocket. I can't afford that much longer, and so you can see the state of Rosetta Code's finances, and how you may help. If you enjoy or are excited about the site, please consider reading through it.

Sorry for the boilerplate; it can be a bit difficult giving an individual greeting to each person. If you post information about your technical interests and background, I'll probably read it. If you already have put that kind of information on your user page, I probably already have; I'm always interested in how people do and can benefit from Rosetta Code. --Michael Mol 18:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

C sharp

We standardized on referring to C# as "C sharp". "C#" wasn't an option, because HTTP kept causing people to wind up at pages about C, and C♯ was passed over, because of limitations on convenient input for most people. For adding langueage examples, I suggest you use the syntax =={{header|C sharp|C#}}==. Sorry about the inconvenience. --Michael Mol 21:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Yea, I discovered that this morning. Will do so in the future.. :P
--LordMike 07:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

MSSQL v. Transact-SQL

You're one of only two self-proclaimed Users of MSSQL on Rosetta Code. I don't use MSSQL, but I'm trying to understand Rosetta Code's structure.

MSSQL redirects to Category:Transact-SQL. Both have "/Omit", "examples needing attention", "Implementations", and "User" pages in the Category: namespace. I'm trying to determine if all the MSSQL pages should be redirected to the equivalent Transact-SQL pages.

Can you help me understand the programmatic relationship of MSSQL and Transact-SQL? For example, does it make more sense to say the Rosetta Code Tasks are encoded in Transact-SQL?
--GarveyPatrickD (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)