User talk:Dmitry-kazakov

From Rosetta Code
Revision as of 12:17, 7 December 2008 by rosettacode>Dmitry-kazakov (Portability of PPMs)

Language Table

I was thinking about adding a "parameter passing methods available" column to the big language table. If I do, it should probably have an informational article to go with it. Do you think you're up for it? --Mwn3d 03:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I'll try. --Dmitry-kazakov 07:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


binary mode

About the problem you talk about on the ppm output article, I am used to see that it is possible to open a file in binary mode on your OS.
Isn't it possible with this programming language ? Blue Prawn 11:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

It is OS-specific too. In earlier times, when OS was an OS (:-)), there was RSX-11, for example. It didn't have text files in MS-DOS or UNIX sense. There were record files instead. Each line was stored into a record. The advantage was that a line could contain any characters and LF, CR or NUL had no special meaning.
I will rewrite Ada solution in order to make it more portable, but I am afraid the problem with it and other solutions as well will persist. Because if we used binary in the sense stream of characters, then we would have to specify a few more things to make it portable:
  • character is? (octet of bits)
  • line terminator in the file header is? (ASCII LF for example)
  • EOF is? (ASCII LF, NUL, nothing)
And well, PPM isn't our fault... (:-)) --Dmitry-kazakov 12:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC)