User talk:Dinosaur: Difference between revisions
→Sorting algorithms/Insertion sort
Line 56:
:The twiddled version is not actually a formal equivalent of the commented-out DO WHILE loop, nor need it be. I've left the "incorrect" template in for your possible removal, as my judgement may not be to your taste. Cheers, and happy New Year. [[User:Dinosaur|Dinosaur]] ([[User talk:Dinosaur|talk]]) 02:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
::That a test "goes without surprise" does not make a program correct either. You seem to have a problem to admit that an incorrect program is incorrect. Never mind. An insertion sort is not hard, if you don't know how to do it, I will now. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 19:51, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
:::Done. I removed what you wrote about the wrong task, I'll let you make the additions you deem fit. By the way, in my opinion, you are making Fortran sections too verbose, and you are making it look older than it is. "Old Fortran" is one thing, that belongs to history (and this is indeed interesting, as ''history''), modern Fortran is another, and mixing both looks weird. However, as there doesn't seem to be any "standard" about contributions on Rosetta Code, it's really up to you. [[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 20:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
| |||