User talk:Chunes: Difference between revisions
reply
(→Quackery Bug Report: Updated Quackery now on GitHub.) |
(reply) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 54:
:: Thanks for your suggestions; they all seem much more natural than my original implementation. I decided to go with the first approach and updated the factorial entry accordingly. --[[User:Dick de Bill|Dick de Bill]] ([[User talk:Dick de Bill|talk]]) 22:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
== "Runtime Evaluation" Quackery ==
I just noticed your addition to Runtime Evaluation. Thank you. I totally missed the task description. Mea culpa. --[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 21:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
== Loop Downward - off by one start value? ==
Line 120 ⟶ 124:
:: Updated version uploaded to GitHub. [https://github.com/GordonCharlton/Quackery Here.]<br><br>--[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 13:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
::: Thanks. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 13:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
== You got credited on British TV show QI's Facebook page. ==
Hi,
Spotted your moniker on my Facebook newsfeed. Looks like they found your Cistercian Numerals task and borrowed the graphic.
(This link should work without needing to sign up for/log into FB.)
https://www.facebook.com/OfficialQI/posts/pfbid02UWvqebk57mU1ziAbVSZgqSEjN4TYiqwY1bSyWXcxMJDq7Wzk9MnHPip9NrqvaYJnl
--[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 06:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
: Thanks for the heads up. It's always nice to see people using my stuff. :) --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 22:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
| |||