Talk:Zhang-Suen thinning algorithm: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Zhang-Suen thinning algorithm (view source)

Revision as of 20:20, 18 June 2014

7,584 bytes added , 9 years ago

→‎Mathematica's in-built algorithm

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Paddy3118

Revision as of 18:54, 15 October 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 m (signed.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:20, 18 June 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Mathematica's in-built algorithm)
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: ==Inverted axis?== Could someone help explain why, in the example image the following transformation occurs (in the periods separating the R and C, and after the Line 19 ⟶ 20: :I expect that there are removals of some of those surrounding cells before it gets to your '?' cell which affects the final outcome. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 18:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC) ::I'm considering what happens to this individual cell (not necessarily its neighbours). As far as I am concerned, the situation I describe above is the calculation for Step-1 of the first iteration. Nothing has changed (i.e. been removed) before this: all changes are stored, and applied `after` the analysis. So the step-1 rule should apply to cell '?'. And it should be blank (by my interpretation of the rules). But it ain't. --[[User:Tim-brown\|Tim-brown]] ([[User talk:Tim-brown\|talk]]) 19:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC) You are right the table given of P1 to P9 in the task page is actually transformed but ins such a way that the output is thinned in the same way (but with an offset possibly). I am actually calculating with: <table border="1"> <tr><td>P7</td><td>P6</td><td>P5</td></tr> <tr><td>P8</td><td><b>P1</b></td><td>P4</td></tr> <tr><td>P9</td><td>P2</td><td>P3</td></tr> </table> I've got an inverted vertical axis it seems. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 22:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC) :Now I'm a bit more confident in posting my Racket solution! ---[[User:Tim-brown\|Tim-brown]] ([[User talk:Tim-brown\|talk]]) 09:50, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Is the thinned version of the big "R.C." in the task description correct? I have it as: <pre>........................................................... ........................................................... ....#.##########.......................#######............. .....##........#...................####.......#............ .....#..........#.................##....................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....############...............#.......................... .....#..........#...............#.......................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....#..........#................#......................... .....#............................##....................... .....#.............................############............ .......................###..........................###.... ........................................................... ...........................................................</pre> ---[[User:Tim-brown\|Tim-brown]] ([[User talk:Tim-brown\|talk]]) 10:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC) : I've corrected that too Tim. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 22:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC) ==Three Data Files== To avoid every entry to needlessly contain the same large tables, I suggest to add to the task description three links to the tree files of the test cases. -[[User:Bearophile\|bearophile]] ([[User talk:Bearophile\|talk]]) :I think if the outputs are typically in ./# form, the inputs probably should be too, rather than csv. --[[User:TimToady\|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady\|talk]]) 15:53, 21 October 2013 (UTC) ==Mathematica's in-built algorithm== I converted Mathematica's ones and zeros to something I could see and it seems that their in-built thinning algorithm does not give the same result as that of Zhang Suen. I think that it is right and proper to show the output of the in-built function as I would expect that to be used, but I also asked for an implementation of the ZS algorithm as I maked it incomplete. If you think that is wrong then just give your argument please. The following is just a code dump of how I converted to ascii art for comparison using Python: <lang python>>>> print(''' { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}'''.replace('{', '(').replace('}', ')')) ( (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0), (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) >>> inp = ( (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0), (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) >>> print('\n'.join(''.join(('#' if x else ' ') for x in line) for line in inp)) ######### ######## ### #### #### #### ### ### ### ### ### #### ### ######### ### ### #### ### ### ### #### ### #### #### ### ### #### ### ######## ### >>> print('\n'.join(''.join(('#' if x else ' ') for x in line) for line in out)) #### ### # # # ### # # # # # # ## # # # ### # # # # ## ## ## #### ## >>> </lang> --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 20:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)