Anonymous user
Talk:Yahoo! search interface: Difference between revisions
→TOS violation
m (Talk:Search Google moved to Talk:Search Yahoo: TOS Violation) |
|||
Line 28:
::: I've not read the task specs (just the title). If the task was interesting, we loose an interesting task; if it was not, ... But if the task's creator would like to keep the idea, then s/he could take a look at Yahoo. Of course, even though Yahoo's TOS allows for automated use of their ''service'', this does not mean we (or anybody else) can flood it with search requests! And what world would it be if I take a perfectly legal and TOS-compliant code from RC, then ''abuse it'' and for this reason RC has trouble?! (I am thinking about the TOS of Yahoo... it seems to me an automated script using Yahoo search engine wouldn't violate their TOS, so that they have no reason to consider RC responsible of any ''abuse'' of the code... if it is possible such a relationship between an ''abuser'' and the source for the code which made the abuse possible, sites like [http://www.w3.org/Library/ this] or [http://pavuk.sourceforge.net/ this] shouldn't be indexed at all!) --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 00:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
::::OK, i'm converting to Yahoo. And i'll add Python after this. --[[User:Guga360|Guga360]] 02:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
:::::Wow, faster than any other answer to my points:D ! Have you checked Yahoo's TOS? I would like to have confirmation about my interpretation of the text... I've not seen a section similar to Google's "section five", but ... those legal texts always bring me headaches. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 10:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
| |||