Talk:Welch's t-test: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 847: | Line 847: | ||
: |
: |
||
:There is another problem: you damaged the original function, by replacing <code>*ifault = 0;</code> with <code>ifault = 0;</code>, replacing ifault with a null pointer. This will crash the program with a null pointer dereference whenever the arguments passed to betain are incorrect (hence ifault is assigned a value). I didn't check if you introduced another problem in the code. |
:There is another problem: you damaged the original function, by replacing <code>*ifault = 0;</code> with <code>ifault = 0;</code>, replacing ifault with a null pointer. This will crash the program with a null pointer dereference whenever the arguments passed to betain are incorrect (hence ifault is assigned a value). I didn't check if you introduced another problem in the code. |
||
:About *"existing libraries don't calculate correct numbers"*: you should make sure you master the basics of the C language, and debug your own program (and the bugs you introduced in the "existing library", before making such a bold claim. |
|||
:[[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 19:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC) |
:[[User:Eoraptor|Eoraptor]] ([[User talk:Eoraptor|talk]]) 19:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC) |