Talk:User defined pipe and redirection operators: Difference between revisions

m
Line 259:
:: Implementation equivalence (for example: similar buffer size and structure, use of fork(), ...)
 
: One problem, here, is that the interpretation favored on this site (functional equivalence) is trivial in the context of most programming languages - most of these operators wind up being "put a result somewhere". So, to avoid the trivialness of this task we might be inclined to favor an implementation equivalence (perhaps, including: buffer sizes less than multiple gigabytes in size, which in turn means buffers are required in the implementation), but where do you draw the line? For example, is it important to implement a process scheduler as a part of this task? [probably not, but what about the many other dozens of facets of how I have used these unix mechanisms?]. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 03:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
6,951

edits