Talk:Type detection: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:00, 9 October 2015 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) m (.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:27, 9 October 2015 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎Many tasks are also likely to involve evaluation which is conditional on the type of numeric values – perhaps an index would be more useful than a task ?) Newer edit →
Line 44:		Line 44:
	Finally, on the learning aspect of Goal 3, it would clearly be good to find a task which learners are quite likely to actually encounter and think about		Finally, on the learning aspect of Goal 3, it would clearly be good to find a task which learners are quite likely to actually encounter and think about

	( It may also be worth looking at some existing tasks which already demonstrate type-conditional evaluation or flow – ''flattening lists'', for example – just to check that something more focused is really required ) [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 18:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)		( It may also be worth looking at some existing tasks which already demonstrate type-conditional evaluation or flow – ''flattening lists'', for example – just to check that something more focused is really required. There are probably also many tasks which demonstrate evaluation or flow which is conditional on the particular type of numeric values – maybe what is really needed is an index, rather than an additional task ) [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 18:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)