Talk:Type detection: Revision history

7 November 2017

• curprev 14:0414:04, 7 November 2017 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger 11,727 bytes +27 added a section header to have the TOC in the correct location.

19 October 2015

• curprev 11:2811:28, 19 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 11,700 bytes +74 →No signature - you see my point ? It just imposes additional effort and uncertainty on others, to buy a trivial reduction in one's own effort ...
• curprev 11:1911:19, 19 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 11,626 bytes +124 →Spam attempt ?
• curprev 11:1711:17, 19 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 11,502 bytes +209 →Spam attempt ?
• curprev 11:1411:14, 19 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 11,293 bytes +74 →good point - adding the sighature :-)
• curprev 10:4710:47, 19 October 2015 rosettacode>Bugmenot2 11,219 bytes +486 →Spam attempt ?
• curprev 10:3510:35, 19 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 10,733 bytes +746 →Spam attempt ?
• curprev 10:1010:10, 19 October 2015 rosettacode>Bugmenot2 9,987 bytes +1,594 No edit summary

10 October 2015

• curprev 18:0018:00, 10 October 2015 Zzo38 talk contribs 8,393 bytes +118 No edit summary
• curprev 17:5917:59, 10 October 2015 Zzo38 talk contribs 8,275 bytes +758 No edit summary
• curprev 14:5314:53, 10 October 2015 Hout talk contribs m 7,517 bytes +2 No edit summary
• curprev 14:5214:52, 10 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 7,515 bytes +554 →Perhaps "Type detection" could usefully be reworked as '''search a tree''' or '''search a nested list'''

9 October 2015

• curprev 19:3719:37, 9 October 2015 Zzo38 talk contribs 6,961 bytes +395 No edit summary
• curprev 19:2719:27, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 6,566 bytes +211 →Many tasks are also likely to involve evaluation which is conditional on the type of numeric values – perhaps an index would be more useful than a task ?
• curprev 19:0019:00, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs m 6,355 bytes +2 .
• curprev 18:5918:59, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 6,353 bytes +308 →safe static checking in Haskell and Java, unsafe static checking in C++, and dynamic checking in Lisp, Scheme, Perl etc
• curprev 18:3718:37, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs m 6,045 bytes +11 No edit summary
• curprev 18:3518:35, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs m 6,034 bytes 0 →Could the draft description be coaxed into something useful ?
• curprev 18:3418:34, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs m 6,034 bytes +2 No edit summary
• curprev 18:3418:34, 9 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 6,032 bytes +2,293 →Try to coax a spark of spam into useful life as an actual task ?

8 October 2015

• curprev 15:1715:17, 8 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 3,739 bytes +160 →I agree
• curprev 15:0815:08, 8 October 2015 rosettacode>Paddy3118 3,579 bytes +212 →Delete?
• curprev 13:3913:39, 8 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 3,367 bytes +658 Spam attempt ? Why set up facile non-tasks (easily contributed documentation consultation entries) using shared credentials ?

7 October 2015

• curprev 18:1418:14, 7 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 2,709 bytes +413 Tasks like 'flattening a list' already demonstrate type-conditional divergence of evaluation (or flow) but "Type detection" would sometimes mislead.
• curprev 17:5617:56, 7 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 2,296 bytes 0 No edit summary
• curprev 17:4717:47, 7 October 2015 Hout talk contribs 2,296 bytes +2,168 No edit summary
• curprev 12:5712:57, 7 October 2015 rosettacode>Paddy3118 128 bytes +128 draft task?