Talk:Tree from nesting levels: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(/* a '''round-trip''' transformation, to ensure that no information is lost)
Line 128: Line 128:
::I believe the Stack Overflow examples are all fully saturated, with no missing nesting levels ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
::I believe the Stack Overflow examples are all fully saturated, with no missing nesting levels ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
::If [1, 2, 4] '''represents''' object nesting levels, then there is an implicit level 3. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
::If [1, 2, 4] '''represents''' object nesting levels, then there is an implicit level 3. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
:: Perhaps the task could best be tightened up and filled out by also requiring, (as was already suggested elsewhere on this page, I think) a '''round-trip''' transformation, to ensure that no information is lost in the translation from list to tree (and back). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]])