Talk:Tree from nesting levels: Difference between revisions

Line 101:

::Aye, <strike>"You have no control of level 0, and integer zero being the unnumbered root level"</strike>. (For an alternate view, that now I've wrote it, I don't like). The task description is enough to write examples, for I think. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

:: Not necessarily suggesting a change, just thinking it through, and preparing you to understand if some contributions add an extra layer of brackets.

::: Not necessarily suggesting a change, just thinking it through, and preparing you to understand if some contributions add an extra layer of brackets.

:: Forgive me for the notational excursus, which PeteLomax clearly didn't find illuminating :-)

::: Forgive me for the notational excursus, which PeteLomax clearly didn't find illuminating :-)

:: I was just illustrating a couple of probably quite inconsequential points:

::: I was just illustrating a couple of probably quite inconsequential points:

::# that you are speaking of single trees, but actually showing '''lists''' of trees, and

:::# that you are speaking of single trees, but actually showing '''lists''' of trees, and

::# the first example and the rest are not necessarily of the same type

:::# the first example and the rest are not necessarily of the same type.

:: The conclusion is just that if anyone decides to try a rigorous data-typing, ~~that~~ they may produce output that diverges a bit from yours (extra pair of flanking brackets, or additional virtual root) I'm sure you will be able to cope with that :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

::: The conclusion is just that if anyone decides to try a rigorous data-typing, then they may produce output that diverges a bit from yours (extra pair of flanking brackets, or additional virtual root) I'm sure you will be able to cope with that :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)