Talk:Tree from nesting levels: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
m (→Source) |
||
Line 127: | Line 127: | ||
::But the key issue introduced by your examples here, which was not, I think, a component of that Stack Overflow discussion, was that of implicit intermediate levels, for which no integer is supplied in the input list. |
::But the key issue introduced by your examples here, which was not, I think, a component of that Stack Overflow discussion, was that of implicit intermediate levels, for which no integer is supplied in the input list. |
||
::I believe the Stack Overflow examples are all fully saturated, with no missing nesting levels ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
::I believe the Stack Overflow examples are all fully saturated, with no missing nesting levels ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
::If [1, 2, 4] '''represents''' object nesting levels, then there is an implicit level 3. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC) |