Talk:Tokenize a string with escaping: Difference between revisions
Talk:Tokenize a string with escaping (view source)
Revision as of 11:29, 12 January 2017
, 7 years ago→The alternative Haskell solution needs attention
(Too naive :-) withdrew it) |
|||
Line 15:
: Thanks, your point about efficiency at scale is interesting and well taken. This task doesn't specify performance at scale, and I think it can be useful to also show the 'simplest' (or most naive :-) single fold solution, but I appreciate your having documented the issue. Very happy to remove for the moment and experiment. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 09:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
:: Have now experimented, and agree with [[User:Samsergey|Samsergey]] :-) Let's remove it – once you make it more efficient at scale, it converges on the first solution, and needs the double reverse. Useful exercise for me – many thanks for your response ! [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 11:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
| |||