Anonymous user
Talk:Test integerness: Difference between revisions
→Some thoughts: 0j == real ?
m (→Some thoughts: equality of zero and "nul" for imaginary part.) |
(→Some thoughts: 0j == real ?) |
||
Line 16:
: (As per above) I'm assuming that 4+0i is an integer, even though the '''0i''' isn't "nul"; the imaginary part is equal to zero, but it's not equal to a "nul" (depending on one's definition of the equality of zero and "nul" in the previous sentence). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 15:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
:: Imaginary numbers are taught as existing on an orthogonal axis to the reals intersecting the reals at 0j. It ''seems'' OK to thing of am imaginary number with zero imaginary part and zero after the decimal point as equivalent to an integer for this task. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
| |||