Anonymous user
Talk:Test a function: Difference between revisions
why well known frameworks only?
No edit summary |
(why well known frameworks only?) |
||
Line 7:
:Hi Tinku, languages don't have to have ''large'' testing frameworks. The task is worded to point out languages that don't have ''any'' well known testing frameworks, and give those that do, some small chance to show what is extra needs to be done in testing a small function. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
:: Since testing frameworks don't have to be large, Why not simply prefer a well known example and just allow a quick implementation if there isn't already one? I will post a little example in autohotkey. --[[User:Tinku99|Tinku99]] 16:58, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||