Anonymous user
Talk:Stem-and-leaf plot: Difference between revisions
→"do better if you can"???: new section
(→Less Useful for negative numbers?: Data generator and data sets.) |
(→"do better if you can"???: new section) |
||
Line 43:
::: It needs a data set which is less sparse -- more obvious humps, and less unnecessary completely-blank stems. That's all. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 17:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
:::: Now that I'm back at work again, I'm again short on time for everything. See the data generator linked to in the class. Adding additional calls to genhump will add more humps. Tweaking the parameters will adjust the width, location, height and shape of the humps. Run it until a suitable dataset is found. Or provide several data sets, testing and highlighting different behaviors. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
== "do better if you can"??? ==
What on earth does that mean? Can the originator of that part please explain what they had in mind so that we can determine how best to provide output to satisfy the task? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:08, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||