Anonymous user
Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
→Problem with the Tcl example?: Not by much.
m (→Problem with the Tcl example?: Added signature) |
(→Problem with the Tcl example?: Not by much.) |
||
Line 149:
Huh?
--[[User:PhilThornley|PhilThornley]] 16:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
: Hi Phil, the full text for the TCL check is:
<pre>Swapping two fiances to introduce an error
abi is now engaged to fred
bea is now engaged to jon
fred likes bea better than abi and abi likes fred better than their current partner
Engagement stability check FAILED</pre>
:Which is a much better statement of violation of stability than for the SPARK example. Could you possibly read the sections above on writing a checker that prints output that doesn't need too much mental gymnastics to work out how the stability ccriterion is violated? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 17:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||