Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
→Incorrect statements of incorrectness: hopefully resolved?
m (→Incorrect statements of incorrectness: Prevent accidental categorization) |
(→Incorrect statements of incorrectness: hopefully resolved?) |
||
Line 135:
::Thanks for giving your perspective. This does indeed help me.
::Personally, I am happy with showing pairings where both partners would prefer each other over their previously asserted partners. That said, if you want additional information to be reported, I would be happy to provide it -- I just want that to be a part of the task. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 18:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
I have changed the example perturbation to be the same as the one used in other examples to facilitate easier comparison. I've also edited the introductory text for the list of better matches to explicitly state why they are better. Hopefully that will satisfy everyone. I note that apart from the J solution, currently only the PicoLisp solution enumerates all the better matches that would cause a set of engagements to be unstable. The J and PicoLisp solutions agree. --[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 21:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||