Anonymous user
Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
→J Stability Check: Can't work out that stability is violated with the results as given.
(→Title) |
(→J Stability Check: Can't work out that stability is violated with the results as given.) |
||
Line 51:
::Where X and Y are not of the same sex and are the found names violating stability. The PicoLisp error message says "X likes Y1 better than Y2", which may well be the case, but does not point out how it violates the the stability criterion. Looking at the Python example, the check there could be better too, as it assumes that you know that the third name (dan) is the firsts partner. I'll fix it later. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
:::Hi Paddy, OK, I see. Half of the message is missing (though the code itself states it fully in the 'and' expression and the comments). Thanks! --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
===J Stability Check===
Again, it seems hard to work out that the stability criteria is violated using the results of the current J stability check. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
== Title ==
| |||