Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (forgot signature) |
(→Title: new section) |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
::Where X and Y are not of the same sex and are the found names violating stability. The PicoLisp error message says "X likes Y1 better than Y2", which may well be the case, but does not point out how it violates the the stability criterion. Looking at the Python example, the check there could be better too, as it assumes that you know that the third name (dan) is the firsts partner. I'll fix it later. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
::Where X and Y are not of the same sex and are the found names violating stability. The PicoLisp error message says "X likes Y1 better than Y2", which may well be the case, but does not point out how it violates the the stability criterion. Looking at the Python example, the check there could be better too, as it assumes that you know that the third name (dan) is the firsts partner. I'll fix it later. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:34, 20 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Hi Paddy, OK, I see. Half of the message is missing (though the code itself states it fully in the 'and' expression and the comments). Thanks! --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
:::Hi Paddy, OK, I see. Half of the message is missing (though the code itself states it fully in the 'and' expression and the comments). Thanks! --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Title == |
|||
Since this specifies the Gale-Shapely algorithm, shouldn't that be the name of the task? Similar to how [[Lucas-Lehmer test]] finds Mersienne primes? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||