Talk:Stable marriage problem: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Problem with the Tcl example?: Added signature) |
(→Problem with the Tcl example?: Not by much.) |
||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
Huh? |
Huh? |
||
--[[User:PhilThornley|PhilThornley]] 16:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:PhilThornley|PhilThornley]] 16:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
: Hi Phil, the full text for the TCL check is: |
|||
<pre>Swapping two fiances to introduce an error |
|||
abi is now engaged to fred |
|||
bea is now engaged to jon |
|||
fred likes bea better than abi and abi likes fred better than their current partner |
|||
Engagement stability check FAILED</pre> |
|||
:Which is a much better statement of violation of stability than for the SPARK example. Could you possibly read the sections above on writing a checker that prints output that doesn't need too much mental gymnastics to work out how the stability ccriterion is violated? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 17:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC) |