Talk:Special factorials: Difference between revisions
m
→Why is af(0) 0?: variables
(→Reverse factorial algorithm: added a couple of comments.) |
m (→Why is af(0) 0?: variables) |
||
Line 21:
Is it that 0 is the additive identity the way that factorial of 0 is 1 is the multiplicative identity? If so why should it be the identity anyway?
: I think it's just that the formula literally produces 0 for n = 0.
: First run through,
| |||