Anonymous user
Talk:Sorting algorithms/Cycle sort: Difference between revisions
→4 REXXen
m (→number of writes: nevermind.) |
|||
Line 10:
Nevermind, I see the algorithm was only counting writes to the original array. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
==4 REXXen==
Hi. Comparing the four REXX versions as a non-REXX programmer, the first seems neat and tidy in comparison to the other three that seem squashed in comparison. Are the other three really idiomatic and showing REXX off to advantage? Do you really want to show, for example, the single line while statements; or the code so squashed into the comments? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 22:47, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
| |||