Talk:Sierpinski triangle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Variations: new section) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: I think converting it into graphics would be rather simple, even without a really existing function. It is enough to advance x on every space, and set pixel on every *, and advance y on every "\n" or similar... Anyway... what about languages (like Postscript, Metafont...) which have a "natural" graphics nature? Or what about using the codes in the [[Raster graphics operations]] for languages that implemented that, and —also?— a certain common library/package for the others, if (easily) available? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 10:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC) |
:: I think converting it into graphics would be rather simple, even without a really existing function. It is enough to advance x on every space, and set pixel on every *, and advance y on every "\n" or similar... Anyway... what about languages (like Postscript, Metafont...) which have a "natural" graphics nature? Or what about using the codes in the [[Raster graphics operations]] for languages that implemented that, and —also?— a certain common library/package for the others, if (easily) available? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 10:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Variations == |
|||
How about a related task to draw the gasket using the [[wp:chaos game]]? Or the Xor method mentioned in [[wp:Sierpinski triangle|the Wikipedia article]]? I've done both in the past; pretty simple, really. -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 00:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC) |