I'm working on modernizing Rosetta Code's infrastructure. Starting with communications. Please accept this time-limited open invite to RC's Slack.. --Michael Mol (talk) 20:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Sierpinski square curve

From Rosetta Code

My bad[edit]

Seems I rushed in and implemented the Sierpinski curve from the wikipedia page (on the left) not the Sierpinski square curve on the right, then a couple of others followed suit. Therefore I created Sierpinski_curve and moved the Phix/Go/Julia entries there. --Pete Lomax (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

To be fair, I think the Wikipedia article is extremely confusing on what is and what isn't a 'Sierpiński square curve'. I think what we had before is sometimes called a 'Sierpiński square snowflake' so it was an understandable mistake. --PureFox (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Um, This is probably mostly my fault as it is somewhat vague as to what a "Sierpinski square curve" exactly is, and I really didn't clarify it in the task header. I would have been ok with accepting either of the "squarish" curves for this task, but also have no problem with splitting into a separate task if that is the consensus. --Thundergnat (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree that having a separate task for 'Sierpiński curve' seems best in the circumstances. --PureFox (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)