Talk:Separate the house number from the street name
Localization
These addresses look...Dutch? It looks like the house numbers comes after the street name there. Other countries might do it differently--in the US we put the house number first. I'm not sure how to account for this. --Mwn3d (talk) 17:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Right, in the Netherlands -given in the task, Germany also mentioned- we use Dutch and in the other case we use German. Sorry, I have a long backlog of Rosetta issues, besides doing this a have also a job, women and kids.
At Royal Philips we say: Think globally, act locally.
--Siskus (talk) 07:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
The Rules?
Hi, you need a link to the rules for extracting the numbers (in English); or add the rules to the task (preferred). --Paddy3118 (talk) 19:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately a statement of the type "the right answers are here.." just means that someone could print the given text. You describe no algorithm to follow so any algorithm can be used to generate the output. You really need a description of how to do the separation. --Paddy3118 (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- In addition, there seems to be no justification in the referenced article for hardwiring 1940 and 1945. It's certainly possible to blindly translate Scala's regex to other languages, but it would be nice if it also made some sense to people who are from other parts of the world. --TimToady (talk) 23:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- 1940 and 1945 also noted as '45 are important historic years, the years of the second world war of course.--Siskus (talk) 21:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- The problem is that there are many such commemorative street and square names, (there's also for instance: 1813, 1944, 1953, 1960, 1992), so you will at least have to specify in the task description which years we should look for. Fwend (talk) 01:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Vote for deletion?
Despite being asked for some algorithm to complete the task, none has been given after nearly two months and the later questions of this task page left unanswered. The author has also linked a new draft task Starting a web browser to this one, which compounds the issue. --Paddy3118 (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- I vote for deletion, there are already too many of these half-baked tasks on the wiki. Fwend (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, let's improve the tasks. In this process I am. But I am limited with time. This is a draft task, those are half-baked, it's in development. It's so cheap to delete, why don't we delete to whole wiki as well as the half-bake solutions. (I saw crap where a java.util.Calendar is more thread-safe. The author must be kidding. There are only qualities; thread-safe or thread-unsave. This Calendar is the worst API ever and women can't be more, less or maybe half pregnant. Avoid this depreciated crap, it translated from C in the 1990s by Taligent, do you remember?)
- Deletion because the rest of the wiki is half-bake is a poor argument because this draft task will be scarified for the rest of the wiki. It's better to level-up the rest of the wiki then making destructive noises. (If Fwend is also familiar with the task problem, and I think he is, he is able to give his contribution.) Which task has to be deleted, anyway?--Siskus (talk) 10:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)?
- Hi Siskus. I had asked quite nicely I thought, for you to tell us a bit more of how to achieve the goals. You ignored this. You then created another task based on this one too. You seemed to be making things worse from my standpoint - not just ignoring a request.
- We do have some tasks that have been in draft for some time and other members have made it easier to find them and assess them. Some might have been abandoned and just needed others to see they were there, to improve them. This task I think needs someone to write the algorithm of what needs to be done, in English, with the data. Can you do that? Can anyone else? --Paddy3118 (talk) 16:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Several years and still no explanation. I vote for deletion. --Paddy3118 (talk) 18:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC) I vote for remaining (the author is blocked and silenced by Paddy)--Cloudius (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
- User Siskus is not blocked by me Cloudius. What made you think So?
- Even so blocked or not; are you willing to improve this task? --Paddy3118 (talk) 18:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deletion fine by me. Pete Lomax (talk) 04:37, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Fuzzy
Yes a litte bit fuzzy. How to parse "Peace Street 1940 1945" . Where is the street name ? --G.Brougnard (talk) 16:33, 12 October 2015 (UTC)