Talk:Search a list of records: Difference between revisions

Line 70:
 
:: Make sure that other Rosetta Code tasks that refer to this one   (via '''Related tasks''' links --- or the new   ''' See also'''   being implemented via some overhauling).   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::: Yes, I took care of that when moving the page. --[[User:Smls|Smls]] ([[User talk:Smls|talk]]) 04:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 
I think in this form it's ready to be taken out of draft status, but I'll wait a while to see if people have any objections, or issues while updating to the new task description.<br>
Line 77 ⟶ 79:
 
: Also, I much prefer &nbsp; (for this task and other tasks being changed) &nbsp; the old form of the task's preamble where all the section headers are in '''bold''' &nbsp; (which makes it much easier to find the relevant sections). &nbsp; Also, I think all those &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; thingys just obscure the readability of the task's preamble. &nbsp; If somebody wants to edit the task's requirement(s), description, related tasks, examples, etc., &nbsp; they can use the &nbsp; <big> ''Edit'' </big> &nbsp; tab entry &nbsp; (at the top, just like always). &nbsp; There's no need to provide an individual &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; button (an HTML field thingy) &nbsp; for each section individually. &nbsp; Having five &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; thingys (for this task) interferes with the perusing of the task's preamble. &nbsp; Also, most &nbsp; &nbsp; '''Related task(s)''' &nbsp; &nbsp; section headers have been changed to &nbsp; &nbsp; '''See also''' &nbsp; &nbsp; section headers when using the new format. &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 
:: Let's take this discussion to [[Template_talk:Task_heading]]. --[[User:Smls|Smls]] ([[User talk:Smls|talk]]) 04:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Anonymous user