Anonymous user
Talk:Search a list of records: Difference between revisions
→Overhauled task: respond
m (→perhaps 2/3 slight expansions of the task description and requirements ?: added comments about "first match".) |
(→Overhauled task: respond) |
||
Line 70:
:: Make sure that other Rosetta Code tasks that refer to this one (via '''Related tasks''' links --- or the new ''' See also''' being implemented via some overhauling). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
::: Yes, I took care of that when moving the page. --[[User:Smls|Smls]] ([[User talk:Smls|talk]]) 04:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
I think in this form it's ready to be taken out of draft status, but I'll wait a while to see if people have any objections, or issues while updating to the new task description.<br>
Line 77 ⟶ 79:
: Also, I much prefer (for this task and other tasks being changed) the old form of the task's preamble where all the section headers are in '''bold''' (which makes it much easier to find the relevant sections). Also, I think all those <small> [edit] </small> thingys just obscure the readability of the task's preamble. If somebody wants to edit the task's requirement(s), description, related tasks, examples, etc., they can use the <big> ''Edit'' </big> tab entry (at the top, just like always). There's no need to provide an individual <small> [edit] </small> button (an HTML field thingy) for each section individually. Having five <small> [edit] </small> thingys (for this task) interferes with the perusing of the task's preamble. Also, most '''Related task(s)''' section headers have been changed to '''See also''' section headers when using the new format. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
:: Let's take this discussion to [[Template_talk:Task_heading]]. --[[User:Smls|Smls]] ([[User talk:Smls|talk]]) 04:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
|