Talk:Search a list of records: Difference between revisions

 

: It shouldn't be taken out of draft task until most of the programming entries conform to the new and/or changed task requirements and give those programmers a chance to comply and/or comment on the changes and new requirement(s).   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 

: Also, I much prefer &nbsp; (for this task and other tasks being changed) &nbsp; the old form of the task's preamble where all the section headers are in '''bold''' &nbsp; (which makes it much easier to find the relevant sections). &nbsp; Also, I think all those &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; thingys just obscure the readability of the task's preamble. &nbsp; If somebody wants to edit the task's requirement(s), description, related tasks, examples, etc., &nbsp; they can use the &nbsp; <big> ''Edit'' </big> &nbsp; tab entry &nbsp; (at the top, just like always). &nbsp; There's no need to provide an individual &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; button (an HTML field thingy) &nbsp; for each section individually. &nbsp; Having five &nbsp; <small> [edit] </small> &nbsp; thingys (for this task) interferes with the perusing of the task's preamble. &nbsp; Also, most &nbsp; &nbsp; '''Related task(s)''' &nbsp; &nbsp; section headers have been changed to &nbsp; &nbsp; '''See also''' &nbsp; &nbsp; section headers when using the new format. &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:21, 22 August 2016 (UTC)