Anonymous user
Talk:Roman numerals/Decode: Difference between revisions
m
corrected a misspelling.
m (→Roman numeral numbers: added whitespace, corrected some typos and misspellings.) |
m (corrected a misspelling.) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== I for one like Roman numerals ==
'Nuff said. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
== Hello ==
Hello<br>
My code http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Roman_numerals/Encode#Prolog works in both ways Roman => Arabic and Arabic => Roman. It can be published in this page. [[user:Trap D]] 13/05/2011 18:25
Line 4 ⟶ 8:
==Roman numeral numbers==
I feel that any legal Roman numeral number (such as
Also, numbers such as '''IIXX''' should also be converted correctly, as they do appear on old structures and tombstones. Even though modern rules say such a construct may be invalid, the number still has an equivalent decimal number. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 03:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Line 23 ⟶ 27:
==Roman numeral, returning an integer==
This task
What if the Roman numeral contains (or is) a fraction?
I presume then, that Roman numerals to be checked won't have fractions. The Romans had a base '''12''' fractional system. One-twelfth (fraction) is an ''ounce'' which we still use in (for weight) pounds and ounces, where the troy pound contains 12 ounces. An '''ounce''' is also used as a unit of time. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 07:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
:We aren't doing fractions here. In general "Roman numerals" refers to the the integers. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:50, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
|