Talk:Read a configuration file: Revision history

27 July 2013

• curprev 18:1218:12, 27 July 2013 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger 11,368 bytes +362 →REXX vs ooRexx: added a note about the REXX program example (and it's fix). -- ~~~~

24 July 2013

• curprev 19:4719:47, 24 July 2013 Walterpachl talk contribs 11,006 bytes +645 →REXX vs ooRexx: a Problem in the REXX solution?
• curprev 18:2218:22, 24 July 2013 Walterpachl talk contribs 10,361 bytes +147 →REXX vs ooRexx: thanks
• curprev 17:3117:31, 24 July 2013 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger 10,214 bytes +1,111 →REXX vs ooRexx: specified which REXXes failed with a (non-classic) REXX example. -- ~~~~
• curprev 07:1007:10, 24 July 2013 Walterpachl talk contribs 9,103 bytes +217 →REXX vs ooRexx: new section

3 July 2012

• curprev 15:3015:30, 3 July 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 8,886 bytes +4 →current task: added italics to indicate what is what (as per the meaning of a word). -- ~~~~

29 March 2012

• curprev 17:1017:10, 29 March 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 8,882 bytes +447 →"Standard": added ubiquitous comma use. -- ~~~~
• curprev 16:5116:51, 29 March 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 8,435 bytes 0 →current task: corrected typo. -- ~~~~
• curprev 09:0209:02, 29 March 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 8,435 bytes +249 →"Standard": more comments on (people) names. -- ~~~~
• curprev 09:0009:00, 29 March 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 8,186 bytes +1,880 →"Standard": added answer to what's not clear. -- ~~~~
• curprev 08:1908:19, 29 March 2012 rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m 6,306 bytes +269 →current task: questioning the need for the archaic word: speeling. -- ~~~~

24 April 2011

• curprev 19:1119:11, 24 April 2011 rosettacode>Markhobley 6,037 bytes +692 Which part of the format is not clear from the example?
• curprev 19:0019:00, 24 April 2011 rosettacode>Markhobley 5,345 bytes +421 →current task
• curprev 18:0718:07, 24 April 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 4,924 bytes +433 →"Standard": Work on the description or change the "standard"?
• curprev 17:1817:18, 24 April 2011 rosettacode>Dkf 4,491 bytes +268 →"Standard": More nitpicking
• curprev 17:1417:14, 24 April 2011 rosettacode>Dkf 4,223 bytes +447 →"Standard": Still not nailed…

28 February 2011

• curprev 00:1500:15, 28 February 2011 rosettacode>Markhobley 3,776 bytes +527 original parser implementations

21 February 2011

• curprev 00:4700:47, 21 February 2011 rosettacode>Markhobley 3,249 bytes +615 History of the file format, and the reasoning behing the two comment symbols

16 February 2011

• curprev 20:2320:23, 16 February 2011 MikeMol talk contribs 2,634 bytes +223 →"Standard": Agreed.
• curprev 20:1120:11, 16 February 2011 rosettacode>Jofur m 2,411 bytes +217 →"Standard": language specific?
• curprev 20:0020:00, 16 February 2011 Tikkanz talk contribs 2,194 bytes +136 →"Standard": +1
• curprev 18:4918:49, 16 February 2011 rosettacode>Kevin Reid 2,058 bytes +324 “standard”

11 February 2011

• curprev 04:4104:41, 11 February 2011 rosettacode>Kernigh 1,734 bytes +351 So I wrote a Ruby example...
• curprev 03:5903:59, 11 February 2011 rosettacode>Paddy3118 1,383 bytes +611 →current task: +1 on .ini file format

10 February 2011

• curprev 22:5922:59, 10 February 2011 rosettacode>Dkf 772 bytes +266 What about .properties or INI? They're at least clearly defined…
• curprev 22:2822:28, 10 February 2011 Rdm talk contribs 506 bytes +506 Created page with "== current task == Ok, so we currently have a task here without any implementation. But I find it odd that we are supposed to set a value based on the contents of a comment in ..."