Talk:Rare numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→Tweaks, Go (Turbo): added remark about long
(→Tweaks, Go (Turbo): verified c++ tweaks) |
m (→Tweaks, Go (Turbo): added remark about long) |
||
Line 910:
::I recently installed mingw and verified that the tweaked c++ 10-19 version does indeed execute in 8 2/3 minutes for the 19 digit block. The overall time for blocks 10 - 19 is 10 1/3 minutes.
:: I also installed gmp and tried the c++ 20+ digit version, but found issues. 10, 12, & 13 had normal output, but digits 14 and up spent the approximate calculation time without producing any solutions. Has anyone else observed this issue? (By the way, I had to change ''long'' to ''long long'' in either version. Perhaps part of my issue?) --[[User:Enter your username|Enter your username]] ([[User talk:Enter your username|talk]]) 02:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
== 21+ digit rare numbers ==
| |||