Talk:Random number generator (device): Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Random number generator (device) (view source)

Revision as of 11:13, 5 January 2021

254 bytes added , 3 years ago

→‎Primer notes: update

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Cregox

Revision as of 11:08, 5 January 2021 (view source) rosettacode>Cregox No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 11:13, 5 January 2021 (view source) rosettacode>Cregox (→‎Primer notes: update)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: : OpenBSD 4.8 and before had /dev/urandom giving random numbers, but /dev/random giving only errors. (This was because /dev/random was a reserved device, and /dev/srandom of OpenBSD was like /dev/random of Linux.) So /dev/urandom was better than /dev/random for OpenBSD. This has changed with OpenBSD 4.9 (from May 2011); now /dev/random also gives random numbers. So if some example on Rosetta Code uses /dev/random, I will not care to change it to /dev/urandom. --[[User:Kernigh\|Kernigh]] 04:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC) feels like this is all outdated now. please, read my comment below! 😘 --[[User:Cregox\|cregox]] ([[User talk:Cregox\|talk]]) 11:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC) ==Libraries and features== Line 13 ⟶ 15: :::: OK: So let's say, it should involve real-world generated entropy during each step, and define the scope of this task to what is covered by the Wikipedia article. --[[User:Abu\|Abu]] 15:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC) ==/dev/urandom== in #pearl someone said: >: Whether /dev/urandom is good enough for cryptographic work is debated, though on most UNIX systems it is at least as good as the Win32 Crypto API. that's also what came up on the summary i found on duck when searching for `kotlin dev/urandom`. Line 24 ⟶ 27: feels like a "global warming" debate, if john oliver knows what i mean. --[[User:Cregox\|cregox]] ([[User talk:Cregox\|talk]]) 11:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)