Talk:Pseudo-random numbers/PCG32: Difference between revisions
→Excellent ! It sounds like you have some additional variants to offer
(→The Pseudocode: Un-idiomatic.) |
|||
Line 43:
:::::::Your personal style is not idiomatic Python. It is longer and less intelligible by the Python community, in fact, rejected by the community and the then BDFL, as well as not coming up for reconsideration. Idiomatic functional Python is not what you write. As you avoid stating. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 03:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
:::::::: Excellent ! It sounds like you have some additional variants to offer.
:::::::: I am looking forward to reading them :-)
:::::::: Writing an alternative draft is, of course, the only constructive use of these divergences. I might often feel puzzled by the sheer unreliability and stylistic incoherence of some variants touchingly announced to be 'idiomatic', but these things don't need to be said.
:::::::: Variant drafts are much more useful and interesting Rosetta commentaries, and much more eloquent too. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 06:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
| |||