Talk:Primorial primes: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Duplicate?)
 
(→‎Duplicate task?: Further comment.)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Duplicate task? ==
== Duplicate task? ==
This really seems to be almost an exact duplicate of [[Sequence of primorial primes]]. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
This really seems to be almost an exact duplicate of [[Sequence of primorial primes]]. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

:Doh, you're right it is :(

:Think I'd assumed that if the factorial primes task hadn't been done before, then this wouldn't have been done either without actually checking.

:You can delete it if you like. I don't think anyone will be too bothered as the code is just a minor variation of that needed for the factorial primes task. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 07:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

::Put up a warning box pending removal. Pity. I think your version asks for output that is easier to follow but... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I moved the Raku version over as an alternate. Alogol 68 doesn't have an entry on that page. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 12:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

:: I added an Algol 68 entry to that page, in case ths one gets deleted. I agree with Thundergnat - I think the output required by this task is much easier to follow. --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 12:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

:::Sorry for the hassle everyone. I've moved the Wren-GMP version over to the earlier task as I didn't have that when I wrote the Wren code for that task. The 'basic' version has been discarded. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2022

Duplicate task?

This really seems to be almost an exact duplicate of Sequence of primorial primes. --Thundergnat (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Doh, you're right it is :(
Think I'd assumed that if the factorial primes task hadn't been done before, then this wouldn't have been done either without actually checking.
You can delete it if you like. I don't think anyone will be too bothered as the code is just a minor variation of that needed for the factorial primes task. --PureFox (talk) 07:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Put up a warning box pending removal. Pity. I think your version asks for output that is easier to follow but... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I moved the Raku version over as an alternate. Alogol 68 doesn't have an entry on that page. --Thundergnat (talk) 12:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
I added an Algol 68 entry to that page, in case ths one gets deleted. I agree with Thundergnat - I think the output required by this task is much easier to follow. --Tigerofdarkness (talk) 12:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Sorry for the hassle everyone. I've moved the Wren-GMP version over to the earlier task as I didn't have that when I wrote the Wren code for that task. The 'basic' version has been discarded. --PureFox (talk) 13:30, 14 August 2022 (UTC)