Revision as of 20:42, 8 April 2016 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:42, 8 April 2016 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 18: 121,547(1.171.03*10)^2 s = 17651 s [[user#Horsth\|Horsth]] The implementation of primorial I am using, running on this laptop, took 0.002909 seconds for primorial 100000 and 0.049093 seconds for primorial 1000000. With digit counts, that became 0.004267 seconds and 0.04369 seconds. I guess that's faster than exponential growth rate if by fast you mean the execution time... but ... actually, I'm not sure where I'm going with this. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 20:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Primorial numbers: Difference between revisions

Talk:Primorial numbers (view source)